Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Well my reasoning for it was based on the use of eunuchs in medieval periods. Lords and kings would prefer to have a servant that would have no legacy but his record of service to his master/mistress, as they could not produce a dynasty that could compete with or overthrow the current rulers. The Doll androids serve a similar function of personal assistants and in the case of the Variant models many other roles, and he one who imployed them would know they would have nothing to value but their skill in serving their master. The decision to make them more androgynous also reflects this, as it serves to illustrate their nature (that is, their nature during the age they were manufactured) as harmless chattel. Not feminine enough to offend the lady of the house, and not masculine enough to make the lord feel threatened. The perfect "default" body for mass production. As for the issue of gender, I would say that male would be the default, but since they do not technically have a gender, being robots, feel free to have some Standard models that act as females if you feel like it. In terms of IC dialogue and lore, I keep this particular issue vague for this reason, so players can see them as they like.