安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
I suspect that the various ways that Got Lakes can generate mountain ranges and then remove some of the mountains leads to mountain ranges that could *in theory* confuse the game with respect to mountain tunnels.
In fact, a few years ago someone reported that two mountain tunnels from different mountain ranges were behaving as if they were in the same range. But that was years ago.
So far I haven't had much luck in reproducing/diagnosing this issue. Maybe I'll try to look for it in my current game.
Thanks for the reply. I'm happy to provide screenshots and/or files if it would help?
Here is the sort of thing I'm experiencing:
https://imgur.com/a/R0CetzP
For the 1st one, it looks like there might be a river between your capital and its adjacent qhapaq nan. So maybe the route through the mountains costs more movement points than you think? Looks like 4 tiles that might have roads vs tunnel + river crossing to your capital.
Either that or the game's routing can't tell that the tunnel is faster. Sometimes the game recommends suboptimal routes, or doesn't calculate things like embarking/disembarking correctly, so it wouldn't surprise me if the tunnel route was considered "longer" just because it was "less direct" than the road.
For the 2nd one, not sure why the lower qhapaq nan didn't work. Sounds like another weird routing quirk.