Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Greatswords are absolutely a two handed weapon, as you suggested, but they are not nearly long enough to act like a pole arm. Most polearms were over 12 feet in length. The greatsword hanging on my wall is merely 5 to 5.5 feet of blade and maybe a foot of hand grip, while my long swords are about 3.5 to 4 feet of blade with about half a foot of grip. Your second hand would be mostly on the pommel.
Not sure how you'd use a greatsword or claymore to swing over another person, or attack a rider on a horse! Both are the primary purpose of polearms.
---
Though, now that I look at the web, I see there is a bit of conflict on this subject. Some might call an arming sword a long sword, due to its length. Others seem to claim that a longsword is exclusively a two handed sword (wikipedia, for example). Also, the English Longsword was a two handed weapon. So, there is potential that a longsword could be a two handed style weapon. I apparently don't own an English Long Sword.
Despite that, I would definitely argue that the majority of longswords are not two handed. They simply don't have enough grip for it. Some sites are saying that swords as short as 110cm (3.5 feet) are still long swords.
No matter the terminology, there is not a powerful one-handed sword used for slashing represented in the mod. Most people, when going sword and board, will be thinking of something akin to the arming sword, and a gladius is definitely not that.
2. It may be intended for balance anyway, which will always be more important than using the correct word for an ancient weapon.
3. Like everyone else, you didn't read the description which says *bug reports will not be monitored here*.
Polearms are most certainly not usually over 12 feet! Most polearms are about 6-7 feet long, with the notable exception of the pike, which was a weapon for formations not individuals anyway. The reason a greatsword (real zweihander type, not D&D type) is often classed as a polearm is because it's really too heavy to use with both hands on the hilt like most swords, it's best used with one hand before the crossguard in a half-swording style.
Polearms were not exclusively used against mounted enemies, they were used man-to-man, and attacking past an ally is something that would typically only be seen in a pike formation. Search youtube for "spear versus sword", "spear fencing", or "halberd fencing" for examples of how you would use a polearm in a melee.
Your primary complaint, however, I can get right behind. The gladius is definitely a short stabbing sword, and there should definitely be a one-handed side-sword between that and the two-handed longsword. Of course, both gladius and side-sword are sidearms, and I wouldn't want to go into battle with just a sidearm; I'd want a polearm as my primary weapon.