Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There's a big box to describe your opinions about the game. That's where you explain why you chose the recommendation that you did.
+1
The value of the score aggregate derives from a large number of reviews. It honestly doesn't matter whether any individual review is "recommend" or "don't recommend".
Devs and players won't reach any conclusion afterwards.
If your answer is "I don't have an answer to that", then you just don't have an answer to that. If you still feel a need to tell people you don't have an answer to the question they came to get an answer to, start a curator group.
"eh".
Not helpful.
Neutral is a shrug of the shoulders and defaults to no.
They're more like recommendations or endorsements (hence their binary yes/no nature). An actual review wouldn't necessarily have to be binary.
But Steam decided to call them "reviews" so now we have people doing a thing believing they're doing another.
Вот только в первую очередь человек смотрит на саму оценку.И даже если автор ругает игру,но остался ей более-менее доволен,то для читателя будет стоять лайк+критика=похвала.Кстати,поэтому и было изменено на "крайне положительные" и т.п.А "плохие" и "негативные" были убраны.
Именно поэтому я и читаю ТОЛЬКО негативные отзывы,т.к. более реальные отзывы.