Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You bought token\currency, you sold token\currency - token isnt 18+ object - no restrictions here
visa/mc learns that token is used to buy adult content
visa/mc tells token booths and Valve to cease and desist.
Okay one way to know is that company that made 18+ game made profit from steam - that could be a problem unless they made not only 18+ game - ok sfw version maybe not cofortable for all developers, but you can gift this token for developer without 18+ content - and this developer will transfer money
Dark times we live in... well if by just having such content on the platform leads to economical isolation that sucks...
go go digital Fahrenheit 451 !
I know customers would love it if their rights superseded all other rights all the time, but that's not very realistic either. It's understandable if you think there's room to debate whose rights ought to prevail in this situation that's understandable. But co-existing with others sometimes means compromise. And the thing with compromises is you don't always get your own way.
And not every compromise you don't like is an endless downward spiral where this time next year the only games allowed to be purchases are Tetris clones, because making arguments against blocks is the point everyone can agree is silly.
And Steam cannot cut off MC/Visa cause that would mean cutting of quite a large group of their customers. And while some of those customers might jump through hoops like you suggested to use Steam, most will not.
There is a reason I keep reminding people there is no basis for allowing furry or beastiality but disallowing incest.
As we often see, people like to misdirect from the actual end state to tangents about tetris blocks because there are few morr zealous defenders of corporations than the groups favored by them.
The entire point of what Visa/Mastercard did was that if Steam didn't remove those items they weren't going to allow them to use Visa/Mastercard at all.
So your idea wouldn't work
Basically this, adding another payment method won't work as the entire issue was they had to remove those items or lose access to the payment processor which is used by the majority of people
Peeple who suggest that Valve makes their own payment method absolutely have no idea what MC/Visa are.
Anyway I tried, I get reasonable response - I will continue to think
Yep, the issue is that even if Valve made their own way to pay to circumvent them, the majority of people wouldn't use it. Which is the entirety of the issue
Steam Wallet is already a thing; money to in-store credit applied to the specific account.
The games removed and other identical game types would be more advised to sell on an adult site that accepts any payment method willing to be associated with such activity.