Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Chipset drivers and windows optimisation doesn’t explain why 9070xt was slower than 5070ti on release but is faster now. It should affect both GPUs equally.
Using different brands with different level of overclocking and cooling seems more likely to me. But even then the difference of over 20% in some games seems way too big.
Well, I’m pretty sure they will investigate and make a follow up video explaining the situation.
Would be more reliable if he actually played games instead of just running a benchmark suite.
Because some of those RTX 50 series GPUs are handicapped by design plain and simple
Again - what do you mean exactly?
"Handicapped by design GPU" can mean many different things. Especially in the context of HW's video. Language is not a problem here.
I completely miss the meaning of the second comment and what you are referring to.
https://youtu.be/hf1q1nwoj8k?si=FCpPmFxUJ__G0DcP
That is not even touching on the fact that Nvidia isn't even honest with the performance that you can expect from them. Which has been covered by multiple people online already.
https://youtu.be/bzooe2F6NNg?si=Vfp_FKx4pJH63CrW
No difference in most games but there is some improvement in few of them.
YouTube is suggesting me dubbed videos from various countries with different conclusions but more people seem to not see much improvement with the newest drivers.
Yeah that sounds like the one, he admitted he was wrong a bit later, but common sense should of told him it was wrong before he published.
If they apologised and explained the results then it’s fine. We all do mistakes like every human does. And of they own their mistakes then kudos for them.
https://youtu.be/rlfTHCzBnnQ?si=85ujXUSWzR_FAA4G
Few channels noticed performance gains but to a much smaller degree.
https://youtu.be/yDzVWqncMFA
But this case feels different for some reason.
They double down in a way and say they weren’t clear enough and people misunderstand them.
TechYEScity rightfully calls them out on Twitter.
https://x.com/hardwareunboxed/status/1942132593295810729?s=46&t=gqsuzoxytcBi1N2Do5LHQQ
Calling it "FineWine" while there were problems in the first place doesn't mean it's fine.