All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details
Pam Bondi is upset that people are questioning the Epstein narrative.
I've been asking the DOJ to investigate a Nuremberg code violating multibillion dollar PC game storefront for two years, attorney general.

https://chaosengine.locals.com/post/4700567/still-better-than-the-potential-for-death-if-not-vaccinated-when-infected

Get in line. I was livid first.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zV5tWn7jVTA
Originally posted by King of Games:
Originally posted by Boblin the Goblin:
Originally posted by King of Games:
thats a bit oversimplified. Its important to understand who is responsible when a user posts content on a website. Whether i t being defamatory or outright illegal, section 230 is supposed to give websites protection from being held legally liable as long as remove illegal content if it is posted, failing to do so will have the site seized like what happened with Kiwifarms for a while.

It gets even more complicated when someone representing the wrbsite/company posts something that could leave the website owners liable.
Usually interpreting whether or not Section 230 will still protect the website in those instances is left up to a judge
Not complicated at all. At the time, posting what was considered misinformation was against the forum rules.

That's it. Their site, their rules.
depends on if it was misinformation or not, if it wasnt could be seen as defamation from a employee of the site.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 43 comments
Wait what, how are these two things correlated?
Originally posted by King of Games:
Wait what, how are these two things correlated?

Is it a state crime for a global corporation to violate the Nuremberg code on a global scale?
Originally posted by Punished Narusama v667:
Originally posted by King of Games:
Wait what, how are these two things correlated?

Is it a state crime for a global corporation to violate the Nuremberg code on a global scale?
oh i see
Of course people question it, because people have been lied to for 5-6 years.

And trump's trying to brush it all off.
Last edited by Rio; 8 hours ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VacTcccSd8

Our greatest ally, our greatest blackmailer
Originally posted by Rio:
Of course people question it, because people have been lied to for 5-6 years.

And trump's trying to brush it all off.

It's the logic-pretzels certain quarters are tying themselves into to play the "bu...bu...but wuddabout Biden" card that I'm drawing the most joy from.

Biden is not President. Trump is.

The President has sole discretion over declassification and release of sensitive information (an argument Trump used when he was accused of sharing classified info with foreign powers), meaning Trump--the US President in 2025--is the only person in the nation who could say "I don't give a damn what's in it, release it" and--barring refusal of a lawful order--it would have to be released.

That is not happening.

Add to this that Trump *campaigned* on "releasing the full Epstein files," and the whole thing reeks.

And, lest we forget, Epstein was imprisoned and died--by his own hand or otherwise--in 2019, during his first administration.

"So why didn't Biden release it?"

There are a number of potential explanations, but the most probable are as follows:

1.) The list included powerful Republicans *and* Democrats, making it a sort of nuclear bomb. Despite the fact that most Dem voters have expressed a willingness to see any Democrat on the list burn right along with their Republican counterparts, Biden may not have been willing to gut his own party just to get at Trump.

2.) Biden (or his advisers) may have recognized that any attempt to release the list--if Trump were on it (not saying he *is*, but the circumstantial evidence ain't looking great)--would have been perceived as yet another "witch hunt" or "weaponization of government."

Given that *every other* prosecution or negative bit of news was received this way by his base, this isn't too far-fetched of a possibility.

3.) Biden's cognitive decline may have already progressed to the point where he just *didn't think to do it*--and his advisor may have gone along with this due to possibilities 1 or 2 above.

But all of that is moot given that Biden is not the President in 2025. Trump is.

Trump promised to release the files and now, suddenly, there's "nothing to see here, folks."

And the excuses have just *poured* in.

...cognitive friction is a helluva thing.
I really want to know what the actual goal behind this.
This is such a blatant and obvious cover-up that even normies can see it. Even the legacy media is talking about it. Is this some kind of crazy play? Is this to demoralize everyone? Is this to show they are still in total control and there isn't sh*t tha anyone can do about it?

It really is baffling. There's gotta be a reason they did it this way.
Originally posted by xDDD:
I really want to know what the actual goal behind this.
This is such a blatant and obvious cover-up that even normies can see it. Even the legacy media is talking about it. Is this some kind of crazy play? Is this to demoralize everyone? Is this to show they are still in total control and there isn't sh*t tha anyone can do about it?

It really is baffling. There's gotta be a reason they did it this way.

So what if normies know its a cover up. What are they going to do? What did normies do about JFK? Back when normies were more fit, smarter, and didn't have video games to play all day.

People are going to do nothing. At best they vote democrat, which is just voting for the same swamp the right is in.
Originally posted by xDDD:
I really want to know what the actual goal behind this.
This is such a blatant and obvious cover-up that even normies can see it. Even the legacy media is talking about it. Is this some kind of crazy play? Is this to demoralize everyone? Is this to show they are still in total control and there isn't sh*t tha anyone can do about it?

It really is baffling. There's gotta be a reason they did it this way.

Occam's Razor suggests that if Trump himself isn't on it, some prominent Republicans/MAGA backers are--and that releasing the list with redactions for *anyone* other than the victims (whose identities should be protected) would also be a non-starter.

Same logic behind "why didn't Biden release it?" The likelihood is that there are powerful people on both sides of the aisle (and in the lobbying groups that fund the politicians) who are on that list, and nobody wants to be the person who exposed their own side.
Originally posted by Punished Narusama v667:
Originally posted by King of Games:
Wait what, how are these two things correlated?

Is it a state crime for a global corporation to violate the Nuremberg code on a global scale?
No violations happened.
Originally posted by Boblin the Goblin:
Originally posted by Punished Narusama v667:

Is it a state crime for a global corporation to violate the Nuremberg code on a global scale?
No violations happened.
Ive been trying to figure out what OP is upset about. But i think they are saying Spawn of Tottoro (or w/e his name is) as a representative/employee of Valve calling a post about medical stuff misinformation and removing it is a violation.
But im not entirely sure
Originally posted by King of Games:
Originally posted by Boblin the Goblin:
No violations happened.
Ive been trying to figure out what OP is upset about. But i think they are saying Spawn of Tottoro (or w/e his name is) as a representative/employee of Valve calling a post about medical stuff misinformation and removing it is a violation.
But im not entirely sure
Yes. It's been two years.
I know that I'm not alone when I say that I want Bondi, Bongino and Patel's jobs on a silver platter. They should be ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ pronto. It's clear as day that they are complicit in covering it up and that, once again, Trump made some bad hiring decisions.

On the flipside, however, there is the possibility that it's not being released due to there being ongoing investigations. But I somehow doubt that.

Originally posted by An Irate Walrus:
Originally posted by xDDD:
I really want to know what the actual goal behind this.
This is such a blatant and obvious cover-up that even normies can see it. Even the legacy media is talking about it. Is this some kind of crazy play? Is this to demoralize everyone? Is this to show they are still in total control and there isn't sh*t tha anyone can do about it?

It really is baffling. There's gotta be a reason they did it this way.

Occam's Razor suggests that if Trump himself isn't on it, some prominent Republicans/MAGA backers are--and that releasing the list with redactions for *anyone* other than the victims (whose identities should be protected) would also be a non-starter.

Same logic behind "why didn't Biden release it?" The likelihood is that there are powerful people on both sides of the aisle (and in the lobbying groups that fund the politicians) who are on that list, and nobody wants to be the person who exposed their own side.
There's also the bit where enough influential and powerful people in multiple industries are on it to where releasing it could very well crash the economy and send not just the United States but the world into another depression. At this point though I don't care. Suffering builds character.
Originally posted by Boblin the Goblin:
Originally posted by King of Games:
Ive been trying to figure out what OP is upset about. But i think they are saying Spawn of Tottoro (or w/e his name is) as a representative/employee of Valve calling a post about medical stuff misinformation and removing it is a violation.
But im not entirely sure
Yes. It's been two years.
Facebook had their own little ministry of truth thing during the Pandemic as well that people were mad about as well.
nothing ever came of that, so my best guess is its protected by Section 230
Originally posted by An Irate Walrus:
Originally posted by xDDD:
I really want to know what the actual goal behind this.
This is such a blatant and obvious cover-up that even normies can see it. Even the legacy media is talking about it. Is this some kind of crazy play? Is this to demoralize everyone? Is this to show they are still in total control and there isn't sh*t tha anyone can do about it?

It really is baffling. There's gotta be a reason they did it this way.

Occam's Razor suggests that if Trump himself isn't on it, some prominent Republicans/MAGA backers are--and that releasing the list with redactions for *anyone* other than the victims (whose identities should be protected) would also be a non-starter.

Same logic behind "why didn't Biden release it?" The likelihood is that there are powerful people on both sides of the aisle (and in the lobbying groups that fund the politicians) who are on that list, and nobody wants to be the person who exposed their own side.

Is that why Matt Gaetz was pressured into stepping down in order for the uniparty to select Swamp Blondie for the role?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 43 comments
Per page: 1530 50

All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details