Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Sounds like that amounted to nothing.
The Russians beat cleats back home the second it was clear which way the wind was blowing.
Turns out that invading Ukraine is eating up a hell of a lot more manpower and resources that ol' Vlad likes to let on.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly5zmm186no
We're still playing the old "enemy of my enemy" game.
Worked out super well when we armed and funded the Mujahedeen fighting Russia in Afghanistan.
And again when we armed and funded Saddam when he was fighting Iran.
You'd think we'd learn, but the American electorate (and therefore our leadership) likes nothing more than to "look forward and move on" when the past is inconvenient or embarrassing.
Don't forget funding ukraine after ww2 if we needed them to fight the soviet union.
Ukraine was part of the USSR up until it collapsed. There was no "independent" Ukraine in the immediate aftermath of WW II.
There is now--and to be clear, it should stay that way.