STEAM GROUP
Custom TF2 Weapons cTF2w
STEAM GROUP
Custom TF2 Weapons cTF2w
754
IN-GAME
4,919
ONLINE
Founded
19 June, 2015
Language
English
Location
United States 
Showing 31-40 of 72 entries
3,550
Suggestions for New Weapons (or New Attributes)
...why not instead of just complaining at an idea, how about some ligitamite critasisum? you know instead of "just trash it" or "this is underpowered because MATH AND NO ACTUAL IN PRACTICE TESTING!" you actually offer your take on it in a less "throw it in your face" mannor while still keeping the core concept? please?[/quote]
But they had the same ammo capasity, regardless of their use seperate or in conjunction. Your description made me have to assume that the shotgun magically gained 200 offhand ammo. Which is very annoying in a forum like this, it confuses people!

Because I explained how it goes wrong. I shouldn't need to balance out every weapon myself to identify the problems, you could easily do that on your own. And this weapon truely does have its problems that I have shown in great detail, the mathematics prove that. Even on a conseptual level, a weapon that removes 10% of offhand ammo for itself AND its partner weapon that would math out to produce less overall shots left compared to stock is just obvious for one to see without in-game tests.

My criticm allows you to see the faults or benefits of your weapons. FIX THEM. Because when another person tries to fix other weapons, creative discrepency creeps in and no one would be happy with the final product. My style should allow you and others see minor or major points of concern based on my responce, if every problem was in a monotone, then you could focus on the minor problems and leave in the elephant in the weapon's balance.

Plus how my opinion is not "legitimate criticm" is a real big slap in the face, thanks. [/quote]
1) no....just.....no.... anyone on here with a grasp of basic gaming terms know what a shared ammo pool is.

2) sure you explained how it goes wrong, but never offered anything to correct it and just stuck with the lazy "trash it" excuse because of what you said. that's not critisum. that is refered to as "bitching about something and not doing anything about it."

3) okay, are you a comidian? because that just left me laughing my ass off. you think ANY of the weapons on here are the result of a single persons stats straight? because if you do....well....jokes on honestly on you. serriously, balences, both before implimentation and after are the results of multiple other peoples inputs. their critisisums. REAL critisisums that actually show what's wrong and their take on how to correct it. and while yeah, weapons do end up scrapped like that, it's still because of more than one person or because someone couldn't optimise it and server lagging and crashing happened. or just because they were out right over powered.

4) already apologiesed for it.

side note, apologies on my english...i'm not very good at spelling. to used to auto correct and all that jazz.
Showing 31-40 of 72 entries