Redeving Ducky. 12 hours to object, due to the amount of people already involved simple no will not do. Get one more dev to back you with your no.


==== Consensus ===

17:21 - Python1320: where's your list
17:20 - Ducky Canard: flex yes
twist yes
tenrys yes
lixquid yes
shell32 yes
python yes

--------------

17:23 - Python1320: can we dev ducky
17:23 - Kraken: idk he doesn't do lua stuff no?
17:24 - Python1320: he does
17:24 - Python1320: some at least
17:23 - Kraken: nice then yes
17:24 - Python1320: he used to be dev
17:23 - Kraken: ohh yeah
17:24 - Python1320: but was undeved because of the slowly handled leak
17:37 - Kraken: so I talked to ducky and I believe he's good

------------

17:22 - Python1320: Can dev redev ducky now
17:22 - Python1320: flex yes
twist yes
tenrys yes
lixquid yes
shell32 yes
python yes
17:22 - ＭｅｔａＭａｎ: ok
17:27 - Python1320: Have you researched ducky enough to be sure he poses no threat?
17:27 - ＭｅｔａＭａｎ: no
17:27 - ＭｅｔａＭａｎ: that's why i'm also going to add a disclaimer
17:29 - Python1320: msa can work on consensus in case potcfdk is unavailable
17:29 - ＭｅｔａＭａｎ: nobody wants to do it :v

------------

17:20 - Python1320: can we dev ducky now
17:21 - Python1320: he has a list of yesdevs
17:20 - !𝖼𝖺𝗄𝖾: don't mind

------------

17:34 - KeyLimePie: so if ducky feels sorry about this mess he created back then and he promises not to ♥♥♥♥ this up: ok
17:34 - KeyLimePie: everybody deserves a second chance

------------

17:35 - Python1320: any words to say about you being undeved last time
17:35 - Ducky Canard: yes
17:35 - Python1320: are you sorry
17:36 - Python1320: will it happen again
17:36 - Python1320: etc
17:35 - Ducky Canard: it was an accident, and i have learned a lot since then
17:35 - Ducky Canard: and it will never happen again
17:36 - Python1320: don't promise what you can't keep
17:35 - Ducky Canard: i can keep it.


-----------

17:43 - Python1320: I'll just mark you as "not no"/acknowledged
17:42 - ukgamer: ok


-----------