I give Ebb and Flow each an iphone.

I now say, theft is a moral good.

Ebb steals from Flow, except now that he has it in his possession he has stopped stealing. He is no longer good because he is not in the action of stealing.

This means theft cannot be a moral good because it is impossible to achieve.

If i say, theft is a universally preferrable behaviour, then i do not only want to steal- but to be stolen from. This means theft can never occur, if everybody wants to be stolen from.

Thus, theft can never be a virtue. In contrast, respecting somebody's property is a moral good because you can do so simply by not being in somebody's property lest you are permitted (Because you can't report somebody for assoult if you're in a boxing ring, get it?).

If theft can never be a virtue, meaning that nobody could claim it as their own virtue (Because they would be wrong), then it is proof that there is such a thing as objective ethics, and we know for sure that UPB is objective.

What morality has to do with gamers, i'm not quite sure though. I never hear gamers speak about morality. It's mostly marketing ethics- More specifically MTX.

LMFAO

It comes from you wondering what a 'group for cartoon pornography' fits in to psychology. It's in the paragraph. Furry porn would be an example of cartoon pornography.

Did you genuinely forget what you even asked for already?

Too autistic for me to continue. Go back to bitching about weebs i guess.

I enjoy the topic of law & order itself. Why would i state ''I enjoy following and abiding the law''? That would be silly.
You can't misinterpret that if you look at the other things categorized in what i enjoy. It's very clear you intentionally missunderstood what the hell i was talking about. I mean how would 'enjoying philosophy' work? You're just attempting to make a correlation so you can say ''Aha, gotcha!''.
Also just to fuck with you, VAC bans are not under law. They're under rule and possibly ethics.

Your second comment i have troubles understanding, or how it is relevant. You mean that i follow Shädman? I think he's a cool guy with decent opinions, especially since he's a porn artist he has a lot of insight about what it's like to be an artist in general- And specifically a porn artist, and conflicts between other artists. That along with his comedy and skits are pretty entertaining.
I could also spin your argument against me by saying ''Well i enjoy investigating the psychology behind why furry porn is a thing among people'' if you wonder how cartoon pornopaphy fits in to psychology, but your entire point is irrelevant in the first place.
And since you'd probably love to use that as an argument that i watch furry porn (Ad hominem isn't an argument but you wouldn't know that)- Nice try, but it was just an example to help you understand.

If i'm an aspiring psychologist, am i not allowed for example to play video games? This is a video game platform anyways, it's not inherently relevant to psychology. You are again, trying to make a correlation.

Watch this:
You're a member of a group that is about searching for friends, yet in that group you are criticising all the people in it. How does that fit in to finding friends when you are driving them away from you?

Heh, got'em on that one bois

But then again, look at yourself. You're called ''THE FRIGGIN EXPRESS'' with previous classics such as ''Furry Destroyer Prime'' and commenting ''i blow up commies in my free time''.

That just makes you sound as retarded and cringe as the people you attempt to call out. It's just a different kind of retard cuz the source is different.

I mean what are you anyways, like 16?

Want me to go quote you about 'Being respectful and dont start trouble' by the way?
Do as i say, not as i do, right?

Because we're not social-science researchers or philosophers that dedicate our life to finding out the answers to these big (Yes, big) questions.

I mean it's not like we have much but opinions to throw at the question. Compared to a social scientist- or a philosopher, what the hell do we really know about this topic?

Yet we still try. A year later, which only proves how little we know doesn't it.

Also new random people who discover the post just now and don't follow the thread, but just post their take on it.

Originally posted by ✪THE FRIGGIN' EXPRESS✪:

An example of being kind is helping someone move a heavy thing across the town without expecting to gain anything from it. An example of being unkind is writing a 3-page essay about some guy's comment because you want to impress somebody who you assume is a girl.

Funny how you quickly you became hypocritical. You started off with 'Be respectful and don't start trouble', and then proceed to make presumptions and throw a tantrum because somebody presented to you that 'being kind and respectful' just aint so simple as it appears to be for you.

Originally posted by ✪THE FRIGGIN' EXPRESS✪:

I SAID, BE RESPECTFUL TO OTHER PEOPLE AND BE RESPECTFUL TO YOURSELF.

Jesus H. Christ, you don't need to write a whole essay about this. Also, saying "nice guys finish last" makes a guy sound like one of those creepy r/niceguys people.

Jesus H Christ indeed, lost your temper already. Not a very smart person are you?

I didn't need to, but so what if i did? It's a better answer than what you gave anyways. I mean you might as well had answered with ''Well to be kind you just have to be kind'', because that's pretty much what you said. You can't describe an abstract term, by using other abstract terms, without defining and explaining any of them. That doesn't mean anything, especially if you can't even explain what it means to you, because how the hell are we supposed to know what being respectful is when you don't explain what respect- At the very least, is to you? That's why i said it likely comes from childhood and parenting which defines the unique details of what each person finds to be respectful.

Things are ridiculously more complex than you could imagine. I can write a whole essay about ''just be respectful you nerds XD'' too.

Don't be so naive.

Originally posted by ✪THE FRIGGIN' EXPRESS✪:

To be kind, you gotta be selfless and actually care about other people.

That's literally all there is to it.

So then the question is what is selflessness and how do you obtain it, as well as how much selflessness can you pursue without hurting yourself (Nice guys finish last for a reason, and expect to be taken advantage of and exploited if you're very selfless).

Actually care about other people, well what is 'actually' caring about other people in comparison to just... caring about them? And how does one care for one another in the first place?

I'd say it's rooted in childhood and how you were raised, more particularly how your parents treated you and what you think of them. If your mother screams at you, not to scream, she is contradicting her own principle which leaves yourself with no reason to do the same back at her because she showed the behaviour was okay, unless you will be punished for retaliating with the same behaviour- Then it counts as abuse (Because the reason to avoid screaming back comes from fear and not principle, virtue, or something else).

To add on that, if you like your parents you are likely to look for similar people. If you hate your parents you're likely to find people the opposite of them. This is why people pick the wrong partners in relationships (One of the reasons, not the only if i must clarify). That can also affect what you see as good and bad (Kind and evil), because if you don't like your parents you are highly unlikely to think of them as good.

To change selflessness and your care/empathy for others after childhood would have to come from some sort of teacher or perhaps book that preaches philosophy, moral values, principles, or of similar decent that argues why they go by it, in which you may come to agreement with.

That was a heck of a lot more than just 'that's it', and it didn't even cover what kindness is in the first place.

Edit: Numerous finetunes and grammar-checks.

Lmfao, looks like you fit in just about right then. This group is for weeby teenagers who are naturally a social-reject class, so you can't expect good friendship or conversation when both of you are socially inept.

I mean think about it. How will you have a good commited friendship if you are socially dysfunctional, and chances are high the other person is of such nature as well?

Also this isn't what Facebook-like behaviour is. Facebook serves as a completely different media to what steam is, and this group in of itself is a subculture within steam's media which makes it even more uncommon.
Facebook-like behaviour would be adding people you may or may not know, and then never delete them but never talk either, and if it is for talking it's about favours, information, or revolving other things in life or sharing dumb stuff you find on the internet.
And that's the uncommon group within Facebook. The overall vast majority of people on Facebook will just keep personal people along with family, and people they've met, know, and have worked with, on Facebook.