Install Steam
sign in
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem

United States



Civilization V (Civ 5) often cite issues with the tactical AI, long turn times, and a clunky user interface (UI). Critics also point to unbalanced gameplay mechanics, frustrating diplomacy, and a lack of strategic depth compared to previous titles.
Gameplay and balance
Unbalanced mechanics: Critics argue that some core gameplay systems are not well-balanced, leading to situations where one mechanic undermines another.
Specialist limitations: The game was criticized for making it difficult to play a specialist-focused strategy in the early game due to a lack of available specialist slots.
Diplomacy: The diplomacy system is often described as a "joke," with AI nations engaging in illogical wars and sudden peace, sometimes turning friendly for no clear reason.
Barbarian AI: Barbarian units can appear and attack with little warning, often in ways that feel unfair and are a source of frustration.