New review.
Score:4/10
Would I recommend this game? Surprisingly, YES. I would. Despite such a low score, it's a good game either way. My scoring system gave it such a low score, but if I used a traditional scoring system it would've gotten a lower score. As it stands, it's fun to play if you like repetitive gameplay which makes you think(like me), but otherwise, I would never recommend this game.
Pros
-Nice Graphics
-Best phsyics engine ever
-Once you actually ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ load, it's actually not that laggy
Cons
-Loading lag.
-Straying from original purpose( NASA in 20 years )
-Still glitchy
Pro Extras
-MULTIPLAYER
-MODS
-THINGS!
-EXCITEMENT!
-♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ TIBERIAN SUN IS IN THIS GAME NOW
Con Extras
-It lags on anything except windowed mode
-Still resource intensive as always
{ORIGINAL REVIEW-DID NOT LOVE THIS GAME}
{3 people found the original funny, and noone found this review helpful. Out of four people.}
I give up on the old joke, so I decided to write a standarized review instead. Oh, I left the joke in the comments though. (EDIT:For those of you confused by my scoring system, it's cons/pros-con extras+pro extras, rounded up. So, 6/2-1+1=3 would make the score proper.)
Pros
-Nice graphics
-Best ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ psyhics engine ever
Cons
-Laggy
-Most computers that starting youtubers have cannot play it
-My computer cannot play it(although this is not counted as a con, it's just me ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ about the stupid computers I have, this does not damage the score in any way)
-Glitchy as hell
-The gameplay SUCKS, as it's repetitive and mundane
-Too little content, atleast in terms that SPACE ENGINEERS was originally founded off of(NASA's technology in 20 years, instead of the SCI-FI mess it is now)
-WAAY too resource intensive
-Did I mention it's laggy? Because it lags, even on computers that are way superior to the recommened requirements(my friend has a intel xeon/xeno(he likes calling it xeno) with 64 GB of RAM and a GTX titan as a graphics card, and he STILL cannot play this game thanks to how laggy it is)
Overall:3/10, just not a game worth buying. MAYBE as a gift.
Extras
-Has it's ass handed to by KSP in almost everyway. Hell, KSP, being considered one of the most glitchiest games of it's genre on STEAM still doesn't bug out as often as space engineers.
+I still like this game, I just wish it wasn't so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ bugged. Believe me, as a game designer, the first thing you want to do is squash as many bugs as possible before rolling out new features, because otherwise, those bugs will be permanently fixxed into the game.

New review. Score:4/10 Would I recommend this game? Surprisingly, YES. I would. Despite such a low score, it's a good game either way. My scoring system gave it such a low score, but if I used a traditional scoring system it would've gotten a lower score. As it stands, it's fun to play if you like repetitive gameplay which makes you think(like me), but otherwise, I would never recommend this game. Pros -Nice Graphics -Best phsyics engine ever -Once you actually fucking load, it's actually not that laggy Cons -Loading lag. -Straying from original purpose( NASA in 20 years ) -Still glitchy Pro Extras -MULTIPLAYER -MODS -THINGS! -EXCITEMENT! -FUCKING TIBERIAN SUN IS IN THIS GAME NOW Con Extras -It lags on anything except windowed mode -Still resource intensive as always {ORIGINAL REVIEW-DID NOT LOVE THIS GAME} {3 people found the original funny, and noone found this review helpful. Out of four people.} I give up on the old joke, so I decided to write a standarized review instead. Oh, I left the joke in the comments though. (EDIT:For those of you confused by my scoring system, it's cons/pros-con extras+pro extras, rounded up. So, 6/2-1+1=3 would make the score proper.) Pros -Nice graphics -Best fucking psyhics engine ever Cons -Laggy -Most computers that starting youtubers have cannot play it -My computer cannot play it(although this is not counted as a con, it's just me bitching about the stupid computers I have, this does not damage the score in any way) -Glitchy as hell -The gameplay SUCKS, as it's repetitive and mundane -Too little content, atleast in terms that SPACE ENGINEERS was originally founded off of(NASA's technology in 20 years, instead of the SCI-FI mess it is now) -WAAY too resource intensive -Did I mention it's laggy? Because it lags, even on computers that are way superior to the recommened requirements(my friend has a intel xeon/xeno(he likes calling it xeno) with 64 GB of RAM and a GTX titan as a graphics card, and he STILL cannot play this game thanks to how laggy it is) Overall:3/10, just not a game worth buying. MAYBE as a gift. Extras -Has it's ass handed to by KSP in almost everyway. Hell, KSP, being considered one of the most glitchiest games of it's genre on STEAM still doesn't bug out as often as space engineers. +I still like this game, I just wish it wasn't so fucking bugged. Believe me, as a game designer, the first thing you want to do is squash as many bugs as possible before rolling out new features, because otherwise, those bugs will be permanently fixxed into the game.