71 people found this review helpful
3 people found this review funny
Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 15.0 hrs on record (14.4 hrs at review time)
Posted: 9 Aug, 2015 @ 7:50pm

Early Access Review
If your going to join a game during early access the purpose is to help finish the development of the game.. Bashing the game instead of giving constructive critisism is not a valid reason to review or to purchase early access. After playing for a while I wanted to review but noticed a lot of crappy feed back..


The game runs fine if you have decent hardware. I get 150+ frames on 1440p... Gameplay is solid and gunplay is solid. Servers run great for me, NA west coast... Game needs a little work as far as 1 round per game and wait time for playing... More guns would be nice and silencers as well.. MSAA is jacked up right now so you can use nvidia control panel... Game play isnt clunky at all you run out of breath from running to quickly but the character movement and weapon draw is legit and fast/fluent. The developers are involved in the forum as well... Here is good proof they are on the right track and working towards making this a better game.. Every FPS is a moch of doom so to say this is a rip off of R6 Siege is silly cause they both been in development for the last 2-3 years... My advice is if you dont like comtributing feedback for a somewhat incomplete game then dont BUY IT.. So annoying, it should almost make you take a n00b test and not allow the purchase to happen cause I keep reading alot of scrub reviews that dont get what early access is about... DERP


DEVELOPER COMMENTS

"We've expected this sort of push-back from the community from the beginning, it was actually a topic of discussion amongst us who founded Nacho Games for a bit before we began working with Free Reign.

It's not something I don't get, or understand, I think it could have been handled better in the past. But to burn a few good guys over your opinions of what happened almost 5 years ago is kind of un-fair, especially when we're trying to be as open and communicative (transparent) with our community as possible about our goals and direction.

If you have questions, feel free to ask them, about us, who we are, what we do, what our plan is, where we want to go, what we want the game to be. These kinds of things will help us grow as a community and a team to make a good game.

All this he-said she-said talk and slander, and especially miss-information being spread about the Nacho Games team needs to end, and trust and information must be built up so that we can accomplish a tight solid community of players and developers working together to make this game rad. That's what I'd like to see."

Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
3 Comments
del *.* 16 Aug, 2015 @ 8:18am 
You can whiteknight the game, but you can't get around the fact that Sergey Titov is behind this.
And him being behind this is reason enough pass on this game.
verzide 14 Aug, 2015 @ 3:00am 
I have an alienware 17 and i run this low 20fps so no its not optimized well
[livE]Unknown_Genius 12 Aug, 2015 @ 6:27pm 
This game was supposed to get F2P (the whole website was about the game is going to be free to play and definietly not going to be pay to win during the "closed" alpha basically everyone could join)
"The game runs fine if you have decent hardware" <- This game was supposed to run on nearly any computer (as the homepage said during the not really closed "closed alpha")
So basically:
This game was build up on alot of lies, also (as it seems) the matchmaking system is still the same bullshit as before.
This game also is a copy of Rainbow Six Siege, the developement of this game started right after the first gameplays were shown.
Since I used to create my own game just for fun, I am afraid that I have to say that this game seems to be made by one guy within 5 hours.