21 people found this review helpful
2 people found this review funny
Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 9.1 hrs on record (3.4 hrs at review time)
Posted: 6 Nov, 2015 @ 11:27am

Had some issues, followed reccomended fix, worked fine in multiplayer which is all I will be playing anyway. People may be having issues but I haven't experienced them. Sad just because it is call of duty it gets negative reviews, yet if it was Fallout 4 having the same problems, people would give Bethesda plenty of room to work with.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
3 Comments
teej 6 Nov, 2015 @ 4:07pm 
@вяσкєиαиgєℓ I am just saying COD Has a negative connotation in the PC Gaming community to begin with (See /r/pcmasterrace front page for today). If Fallout 4 had some performance issues as well, people would be upset but certainly not at such an extreme level they are with COD.

I completely understand it is unacceptable, I just feel people are overreacting quite a bit because it has "Call Of Duty" in the title. They are just trying pretty hard on this port and I appreciate it, its silly to see people refunding and crying over something that will be patched in the coming days, if not already.
Brøken 6 Nov, 2015 @ 2:16pm 
I say what he said :steamhappy:
TwistedNoise 6 Nov, 2015 @ 2:05pm 
You can be damn sure if Fallout 4 came out with such crappy optimization it would get negative reviews... People don't take kindly to paying 60 euros and getting duped with a crappy game performance. This is intolerable for a AAA developer to release a much awaited game in such a state.

Arkham Knight got bombed by mostly fans of the series when they got screwed with the PC release.