安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
I've just started a new game, found another empire about 5 years in and got the -costs buff for ships at year 8. In that case it's hard imbalanced and has hardly anything to do with "catching" up.
It's just abusable in this very early situation.
Also with the AI currently spaming (and not properly using) naval capacity I would either remove the factor or link it with fleetpower. I'm usualy Superior or Overwhelming in Fleetpower and Research if I reach the lategame, but still at best equal in Capacity.
Overall a great idea and I really felt the impact on my economy in the last playthrough when I got significantly ahead, cause the ship upkeep really slowed me down.