Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
10x10 area does not occupy 2 times the area of a 5x5, it takes up 4 times. That means that one Larger Stockpile Storage which holds 25,000 units loses out to four Stockpile Storage which holds 40,000 units total. There is no practical way this building is more suitable for storage than the smaller version save for when it's to be tucked away where it would be inaccessible on three sides.
But here just small math note: maybe footprint sounds like two times bigger but by space it's four time more, so maybe could we get more capacity? With four your small ones I have 4x 10k and still some space between for fence. What about round it to 50k? Thanks again ;)