Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Will play them for sure, keep up the good work!
1. This scenario is about management of losses, not dealing damage. Keeping planes on the ground to preserve them and conserve your forces.
2. This fits well into the campaign. The United States needs a reason to join the campaign. Taiwan needs to show they need support but that they can also contribute to the war effort.
3. It's accurate to the situation in the Taiwan Straight. China is overwhelmingly superior in the realm.
I understand that you may not enjoy this type of scenario as much, but I hope that you will play later missions in the campaign as they will be much more competitive.
SSM strikes will almost never reach enemy ships because of the chinese air superiority and your own naval forces are a joke - Sea Chaparrel, really?
For me this scenario is some kind of one sided turkey shooting - but with the difference, that the player is the turkey. If the aim of the scenario is to show how utter useless trying to defend against such an overwhelming force - ok. But this is no fun for me.
The author put a lot of effort in it and it is a really nice design - but more like a Kobayashi Maru, because you can never win that. At least from my point of view...