Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
No, I don't speak Italian.. Sorry. The text is in the XML/Text Folder, if anyone translates it into Italian I could probably include it officially..
I think your interpretation of the history of Genoa is just as good as Firaxis' interpretation of the history of Venezia. It's a "City State" and Liguria/Sardinia is covered by expanding cultural borders on a standard map.
Genoa did settle Sardinia and parts of liguria, so you need some sort of way to implement settling. Maybe do it like india, double unhappiness from cities but improved trade routes for the UA
The true reason of course, why genoa can't settle is because that would make them extremely OP.
But please tell me what you think. It's only how I interpret the history of Genoa and I'm not a historian.