Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'll have to agree with Quickdraw's sentiment, at least partially.
People are unwilling to nerf themselves, but not because they're "better" than everybody else, but because it's not fun to lose an encounter because you've got a handicap.
Good players are good because of natural skill, not because they play all the time.
I've got 720 hours played, and I'm still mediocre/average skillwise.
Some people are just naturally good at video games, and there's nothing "unfair" about being better than other people.
Some people are bad because they're using less than stellar equipment as well.
Is it unfair that I'm running better hardware than someone, and am therefore able to react to situations faster than they can?