Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It might pay to have multiple ratings per track: layout, navigation and mastery.
Layout: "How hard is it to fly a clean lap around this run at speed, and how forgiving is the layout of player mistakes?"
Navigation: "How hard is this track to learn and get consistent laptimes around?"
Mastery: "How much of a gap is there between a meh time and a great one?"
Might also pay to create a "very easy" echelon for stuff like South Ridge, Antelao, the X-Stages and maybe Aton-Ra? (mind you, this is going purely off of layout difficulty. "Very easy", by the scale you've stated, would be like "you could pick up and play this track and win consistently" or such.