Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I don't know who at CA thought it was a good idea to be condescending to the player, but they need to be smacked, with a chair.
I think a remaining problem are still battles where just the "assessment" of what the battle was e.g. many "sub"types of "heroic victories" will be interpreted completely wrong by the game, like in the example that I've provided... But I think (attention, sarcasm incoming!)
We'll just wait for CA to tackle this when they find the time <3
HAHAHA Thanks, @Shorewall. This mod is simply a supreme victory for modding <3
Coz that's another problem, I think. When you easily crush and foe that outnumbered you by 2,5x, lost a handful of men, all units will replenish their losses before nx round another attack wave comes in and CA calls it a "Pyrrhic victory" with the note "Should we call it a loss instead?" :)
Love that one specifically <3