Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
This would better represent regional/state/provincial/colonial governments attempting to handle the zombie crisis on their own. Thanks to in-game unrest, they’d eventually break free from their former overlord anyway - just in a more gradual, organic way and richer world-building. For reference, I did tried this in an observer game and it works beautifully.
Another idea that might help performance is implementing a “Zombie Survivor” decentralised tag consolidation for split states. For example, you shouldn’t end up with 2+ separate decentralised Guyana, Jujuy, or Mato Grosso tags just because the region was previously divided between two countries before the zombie invasion. Perhaps a monthly on_action script could auto-merge these into a single entity.
Now, I did a whole lot better than the rest of the world but the mod was very different than my expectations. I look forward to further updates and will keep my eyes on it. I hope to see in the future our ability to fight zombies directly with our armies and also news reports when major cities or countries fall to the zombie menace!