安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
This would better represent regional/state/provincial/colonial governments attempting to handle the zombie crisis on their own. Thanks to in-game unrest, they’d eventually break free from their former overlord anyway - just in a more gradual, organic way and richer world-building. For reference, I did tried this in an observer game and it works beautifully.
Another idea that might help performance is implementing a “Zombie Survivor” decentralised tag consolidation for split states. For example, you shouldn’t end up with 2+ separate decentralised Guyana, Jujuy, or Mato Grosso tags just because the region was previously divided between two countries before the zombie invasion. Perhaps a monthly on_action script could auto-merge these into a single entity.
Now, I did a whole lot better than the rest of the world but the mod was very different than my expectations. I look forward to further updates and will keep my eyes on it. I hope to see in the future our ability to fight zombies directly with our armies and also news reports when major cities or countries fall to the zombie menace!