Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I don't think you could keep a lie with so many people knowing it, also, you can support any theory if you just do not acknowledge evidence that proves you wrong. Say, I don't acknowledge science at all and my theory is that the moon is made by magical dwarfs out of cheese and cotton candy, nobody could "prove" me wrong in my opinion because everything they could say is based off something I don't acknowledge.
By the way, flat-eathers are "more right" than the inverse-earthers. Earth in fact is flat for a particale approching the speed of light, passing by earth. For "normal" particles (and us by extension), it is quite round however.