Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The scaling (in terms of reactor mass vs power) is actually slightly less than linear. For example, Apophys's 1, 10, 100 MW reactors are 14.6, 127, 1060 kg.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/46/Carbon_basic_phase_diagram.png This phase diagram of carbon suggests that at the ~2400 K core temp of this reactor, >100 MPa of pressure (1000 atmospheres) would be required to keep the diamond metastable, which I do not think is feasible to contain longterm, especially at this temperature.
Seems doable
@ThatRedGuy As far as I know, yes; reactors scale linearly and are only limited by manufacturing ability.