Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
The scaling (in terms of reactor mass vs power) is actually slightly less than linear. For example, Apophys's 1, 10, 100 MW reactors are 14.6, 127, 1060 kg.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/46/Carbon_basic_phase_diagram.png This phase diagram of carbon suggests that at the ~2400 K core temp of this reactor, >100 MPa of pressure (1000 atmospheres) would be required to keep the diamond metastable, which I do not think is feasible to contain longterm, especially at this temperature.
Seems doable
@ThatRedGuy As far as I know, yes; reactors scale linearly and are only limited by manufacturing ability.