安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The scaling (in terms of reactor mass vs power) is actually slightly less than linear. For example, Apophys's 1, 10, 100 MW reactors are 14.6, 127, 1060 kg.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/46/Carbon_basic_phase_diagram.png This phase diagram of carbon suggests that at the ~2400 K core temp of this reactor, >100 MPa of pressure (1000 atmospheres) would be required to keep the diamond metastable, which I do not think is feasible to contain longterm, especially at this temperature.
Seems doable
@ThatRedGuy As far as I know, yes; reactors scale linearly and are only limited by manufacturing ability.