Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
This totally gets my thumbs up and favorite, as it makes the game more fair without making anything unbalanced.
[Half my squad gets insta-killed through cover by an enemy MEC and Priest in the same turn]
And here I am again.
So thanks for that man, love ya!
High Cover = Better Defense, but lowered aim.
Half Cover = Better AIm, but light defense.
I am using Advent Advengers New Weapon Range table and would like to tweak the cover values to his reccomended 35/50 cover values. Can I just tweak these values in your mod's XComGameCore.ini file. i.e. +LOW_COVER_BONUS=35 +HIGH_COVER_BONUS=50?
Still favorited and liked <3
If you want you can do it yourself, it's in DefaultGameCore search for UnitHeightDisadvantagePenalty, I have mine set to -15 (And have applied the effects of this mod to LOW_COVER_BONUS & HIGH_COVER_BONUS.
My reason was upping High Cover to 45 makes Height Advantage worse than High Cover, which I don't believe is worth the risk.
i always used your three mods before wotc (cover bonus, more starting soldiers, and flashbang)