Hahahahahahaahahahaha

The issue: when you put two letters together in Civ, it will automatically make the second one lowercase. So in the Selection and the Load screen, it would look like Murad Iv

Please fıx the name from 'Murad I V' to 'Murad IV'

correct.

so -ammenities=bonus towards yields except for food?

Great concept and i would love to play the civ. However, the Bostanci does not work. When i garrison the Bostanci it does not take away amenities from the city nor does it increase its growth rate by 100% while the city was in negative amenities.

I have played this civ three times with and without other mods enabled.

Having researched the entire history of the Ottoman Empire for this, I'm not denying that Murad was a very powerful sultan. But he also committed several atrocities and by all rights, his subjects lived in fear with him. In many ways, he was a tyrant, but in many others he lifted the empire out of anarchy and remade it into a force that was not to be trifled with. He is a figure with a lot of nuance.

Captain Lime, maybe you look the situation in the empire at this time. you will see that he was a exellent emperor and bring the empire back to strenght

These are true, but I found Murad's anti-tobacco, anti-coffee, and anti-alcohol bans to be the key points of his reign, as they were used to root out the corruption and treason that plagued the empire during his reign. That's why he gets bonuses from reducing amenities.

He definitely was not a "horrible" emperor in that sense, but he was a monster. The body count of his reign is astronomical, and he was certainly one of the more gleefully brutal, unforgiving, insane, and despotic sultans in Turkish history.

Excellent work. But it also seems that Murad's anti-tabacco policy is overstressed. He was also one of the great emperor in 17th centuary. He saved Osman Empire from Safavid's attack by recapture Baghdad, eatablished friendly relation with Mughal Empire, recentralized the empire. I believe he was not 'horrible', but 'great' emperor.

1) No, that's not how the modifier works. The city simply checks if it has any Bostanci, and if it does then it drops into negative amenities.
2) Even if that was how the modifier works, unit stacking doesn't happen in Civ VI anyways so the point is moot

Okay, I read the LUA more carefully, so sure, you buy a Bostanci to put a city into negative amenities. Do two Bostanci in the same city stack effects?

Why would anyone pay perfectly good gold to buy a Bostanci? As described (unless there's a typo) it does only bad things.

AWESOMEEEEEEEEEEEEE