Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
what if you could form a "fanatic coalition" of some sort to apply 6 ethics to the galaxy? (mine would be fanatic egalitarian, fanatic xenophile, fanatic materialist. then based on the ethics picked it would do one of two things:
1. Break up all federations in the GC, form one new fed with an elected president that uses the imperial mechanics to have a Galactic federation fleet, with the fan egal and other two fanatic ethics. Those who refuse would spin off and form the empire ;)
2. Break up all federations in the GC, form the empire as normal, but impose fan auth and the other two fanatic ethics chosen.
What do you think? My multiplayer group that roleplays coldwars would turn off our six ethics mod and take this one instead, if we could impose six ethics at the galactic level.
Thanks!
I spent several decades unsuccessfully trying to convert a fellow federation member with 2 envoys. I then had a need to actually improve relations with someone, so I did the following:
1. Move all my envoys to improve relations with the new guy
2. Change my diplomatic stance
Unexpected result: my relationship with that federation member dropped 200 points immediately as all those years of harming relations seem to have been applied retroactively.
I'd suggest adding a clarification text in game - in diplomatic stance description, perhaps.