安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Are these two seperate mods or do these two RTG can run on enriched uranium ?
It seems that you're whining because you can't find an energy source that's easy enough for you. Fear not! for there are plenty of power cheat mods for you, or simply quasi-cheat mods, if that's how you rationalise it.
Finally, you don't get to criticise others' work because it doesn't conform to your standards. You are endowed no say in the what other people wish to make, as they make it because they want to. They have done no wrong by not making exactly what some random twerp on the net wants, nor is your disapproval something that must be "fixed" before you grace this mod with the honor of your subscription.
Too bad the fuel consumption is so huge and unrealistic. The whole point of a nuclear reactor is that it generates vast amounts of power with little fuel. The whole point of an RTG is that it uses a larger amount of "fuel" to start with, but that fuel lasts up to 100 years.
These reactors are neither... :(
Until this is fixed, i'll pass on these pretties.
Portable => 60 Uranium => 750 Wd per uranium
Stationary => 250 Uranium => 720 Wd per uranium
If you're interesting in balancing it, the portable should only produce 700 Wd or the stationary should produce 3500 Wd.
But, AOBA, you done a good work, it's nice ;)
I'm not sure I would trust a reactor that has just barely more internal parts than an air-conditioner