Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
In history, it has happened many times that flourishing empires suddenly experience "accidents", which change the course of history that seemed all mapped out.
"Negative" city-states are traps for the AI. Be careful not to complete their quests inadvertently, otherwise you too risk having this trap.
You can also challenge yourself to get there anyway. With them you still have yield gains (culture, faith, etc.).
What was your thinking behind these? I mean, interesting idea, but who would actively go after these negatively impacting CSs? It's this for when I want to pretend I'm an insane drunk emperor or one of those 'I hate myself and want to die' scenarios?