Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Thank you for this
Steel Plate: ~11x
Constuction Components: 20x
Large Steel Tubes: 12.5x
Motors: 15x
Computers: 2x
Given that plates, tubes and construction components have masses of 20, 25 and 8 kgs, respectively, there needs to be far more materials required to explain all that torque these things are exerting! I like your thinking though :)
@Syslis: I think i might take you up on that offer
@namAehT I definitely like the larger-scale gyroscope, it makes ship design SIGNIFICANTLY less irritating, but I think there's an extra factor of 3 in there.
Since α=T*I and the T is what's being applied to the ship, to maintain the same α we need T to scale appropriately with I.
I'll say the small gyrscope's moment of inertia is just m(r^2) for simplicities sake. For a 3x3, the mass scales by the cube but the radius scales linearly, so we get 27*m*(3*r^2)=27*9*m*(r^2)=243*m*(r^2)
So 243 times. Conveniently, this makes the gyroscope more handy for ships in the 15-30 million kg range as well, since 729 gyroscopes on ships of those size verges on absurd.
I just saw I haven't say : Good Job ^^
PS foUrth Horseman
if so better title would be gyro on steroids
What's the power consumption ??
Sorry for mistake, I'm French.