Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
not sure how you missed that one :DDDDDDDD
I'm not an expert on emblem designs or how they're put onto clothing so I think I really did just glance at this wrong by calling it random, but looking into it more the feeling really is off putting to me. I think something like the Ordnance Officer on the workshop gets the whole emblem on front of hat feeling down more efficiently.
An alternative could maybe be a bottle to further lean into the name of "vodka vanguard" but I don't think there's anything wrong with having it be the class icon?
Just in case:
"Buying strange unusual Blizzardy Storm Vodka Vanguard"
the beard is good.
otherwise, i like it, it fits demo and the ushanka model is pretty good
Explaining more indepth how this item could be possibly simplified, maybe providing a paintover/redline of what could be done to improve it, would arguably offer a lot more for the modeller to work with, rather than being vague and expecting the artists to understand.
Arguably this item's pretty alright, detail-wise, and does fit with a lot of other cosmetics currently available in the game, but if you can provide something more indepth, maybe I and others may have an easier time understanding what you mean by 'overdetailed'
I also respectfully disagree on the emblem being too bright, as it only glints on some angles and I think that makes for a nice effect.