あと国民精神の画像も表示されていませんが、これは仕様ですか？

下側の右側のドクトリンの最終段階で獲得できる国民精神『21世紀のシルクロード』の21がおそらく全角になっています。

hey mate, seems to still be draining the destroyers hp, even with the buffs decrease to -75% attrition, u might have to lower it even further just for destroyers

Update for 1.16

update pl

i thought so too, but thought it was strange that it only affected destroyers

It's probably an overflow. I'll check.

hey mate, im pretty sure that ur regenerative hull tissue tech under coastal defence causes destroyers to take constant daily damage, i think its something to do with the attrition buff

I have made minor modifications to the Coastal Defense Doctrine.

Update for 1.15

Wondering if this is compatible with the Vanilla Navy Rework mod?

支持中文吗？

@初雪 so the navy mod is not compatible with Vanilla Navy Rework? because i got a blank doctrines here , trying to figure out for 10 min to come to conclusion that it not compatible

You can make it compatible with Vanilla Navy Rework because that would be awesome.

@Emperor_Dragonias
Please use only one of the two compatibility mods, Cavalry comp and land Doctrine comp. Using both together will cause bugs.

I think this needs a update, I'm trying to run it with the Land Doctrines comp. patch and the cavalry one, but while the latter 2 work, I cant access the Modern Naval trees

I'm sure this mod is a fantastic mod but none of us understand how the Navy works.

Perun video PPT format LMAO. Gigachad move

Bro made it in the fucking perun ppt format lmao

chinese suppose？

This update Only fix Battlecruiser buff.
The +50% hit point correction was too powerful, so the correction value was reduced to +10% to weaken it. Instead, the debuff to armor value was eliminated.
The total firepower of a warship is determined by multiplying the power per shell by the length of time the warship is fighting (= the time it can withstand enemy attacks without sinking). The +50% durability leads to +50% of the latter, and was eliminated because it would make the Battlecruiser firepower too high.

Are the new update features/modifiers listed anywhere? I remember a -25% armor for battlecruisers that is no longer in the middle tree but can't easily remember what was changed.

Fix Japanese localization

Powerful Air Doctrines when?

can you make it compatible wit vanilla naval rework?

Perun aah thumbnail

Sry, I mixed up the localization files and threw the translation for the land doctrine mod, here is the translation for the sea doctrine
{LINK REMOVED}https://disk.yandex.ru/d/sgk1u5NDsytY_g

Thx my friend !!

htt@ps://disk.yandex.com/d/MAqy06rOfXGSuA The localization file has been uploaded, glad to have been of help

Ahhh, well thats rather unfortunate. Oh well, it was worth to try. Was hoping if there were something else you could do modification on the aircraft carriers that would search finding other enemy aircraft carrier and strike them immediately. Besides, great mod! Keep it up.

@Paul Alaskan
Reproduction of search and rescue by aircraft carriers is moderately difficult. The probability of detecting an enemy fleet by a patrol mission is calculated by "high water detection capability" and "low visibility of the fleet".
Since aircraft carriers have poor visibility, it is difficult for them to conduct efficient patrol missions. On the other hand,highly reducing the visibility of aircraft carriers would destroy the balance of the game as battleship shells would not be able to hit them.The same can be said for cruiser submarines.

Of course. Just send me the file in a way that is easy for you to send or upload it online and I will incorporate it here.
Of course, you can also make your own Russian translation mod and have it published.

I translated a quick mod, can I send you the Russian localization file?

Ahhh fair. Was just wondering if I could post my idea down there. I will say here now, I think there should be for aircraft carriers where they would send their aircraft and search for any carriers to strike down instead of taking down actually battleships, cruisers, you name it. I guess you could say this is quite based on the Battle of Midway or not. It would be nice if it were about to be added or not.

There is no discord server. It is a private production.

Hi, do you have a discord server? Just out of curiosity

Sry. Only English and japanese localization file in this mod. If you want to make a translated version, feel free to do so.

hello, rus integrated or not?

@pladian
No

Compatibility with MD?

why am i feeling a strong Perun vibes in those pictures

New update! I have added a modern naval doctrine that is released when all of each doctrine is acquired.

＠SWICCE
Not used. Coastal Defense Doctrine because it is optimized for human players and cannot be used by AI.

Does AI use this doctrine?

@gosheruu
trade interdiction.

What would you say the best doctrine would be for a Battleship based navy instead of Carriers?

Thank you for this mod

@Vindicator
The idea of creating a small elite air force, like the PLD's light infantry doctrine, is a very interesting idea.
If the numbers are adjusted even slightly wrong, the balance of the game may collapse, but if realized, it would be the very fourth doctrine, so I would like to try it out by carefully granting buffs and seeing if it works as envisioned.

As a conceptual suggestion for the fourth doctrine, it could be something related to experimental development and volunteer deployment: pricy but durable and long-range multi-role aircraft, based on medium airframes, with debuffs for other types of aircraft.

Provide bonuses for night combat, bad weather, wing experience gain and so on. For home defence you can add static AA, home defence and interception buffs.

You would choose this role as a neutral nation or minor part of a faction to provide a limited number of very effective aircraft for missions in areas with low airbase coverage. High IC costs, but great return on investment due to more surviveable planes.

It could be a shorter tree like the coastal defence one. I think niches are the name of the game here. There must be ways to create a concept of a small, specialised air force, such as increasing fuel consumption to prevent the use of a huge air force.

Compatibility with UTTNH?