Democracy 3

Democracy 3

Better Gameplay Mod
76 Comments
Jiang Zemin 20 Apr, 2020 @ 11:11pm 
Apparently allowing 3 years olds to drive doesn't increase traffic congestion whatsoever
Kevin McScrooge 15 Nov, 2018 @ 6:37am 
Do the police actually lower violent crime now? It would make sense if it did.
Phoenix10 10 Oct, 2018 @ 6:34pm 
I wish I could put my huge army to good use.
oskar 10 Dec, 2016 @ 4:53am 
can you declare war? if not i would like to see that implemented
SwiftyPeep 4 Jun, 2016 @ 7:03pm 
I'm willing to take over devlopment :steamhappy:
MCA 17 Apr, 2016 @ 1:52am 
@HK-47 There is an option to remove assasinations in the game:tech:
HunSoldiers 4 Jan, 2015 @ 6:59pm 
intresting mod:F
Chopchop1614  [author] 12 Dec, 2014 @ 12:32pm 
As I said, I am not longer developing the mod and if anyone would like to take over they can do.
HK-47 6 Dec, 2014 @ 9:15am 
Can you put in something to make assassinations less common? Because its totally unrealistic how easily you can get killed
Caballum 15 Nov, 2014 @ 4:00pm 
lol
Chopchop1614  [author] 11 Nov, 2014 @ 8:46am 
As of now I would like to post that I am abandoning this mod. It has been fun to do and chat to you guys. If you would like to continue the mod please contact me via email: Taylor-wood@hotmail.co.uk I can teach you to code if you do wish.
Daichi Hiroshi 30 Oct, 2014 @ 1:33pm 
Could I suggest some new policies? The first one I'd like to suggest is a policy that requires police to wear cameras, and how widespread it it is. The second is economy stimulus packages which tries to revitilize the economy (aka the GDP). Also...I wish to make it known to everyone that I'M NOT INTERESTED IN TALKING ABOUT THE POLITICS BEHIND THESE POLICIES! I just want to play the game! Lol
Chopchop1614  [author] 22 Oct, 2014 @ 11:53pm 
I think you can find I can delete comments I don't like. So I deleted your comment. You know who you are.
IvanTheChemist 16 Oct, 2014 @ 6:56am 
From what I saw the Army Training is already present in the default game. Internet Security is just another name for Censorship in the description.
IvanTheChemist 15 Oct, 2014 @ 4:47pm 
I subscribe for Secret Police, Army Training, Internet Security and Best Health.
Chopchop1614  [author] 14 Oct, 2014 @ 8:48am 
woops yeah just realised
Jakobb 14 Oct, 2014 @ 5:51am 
I think lordoffreedom was talking to me.
Maybe?
Chopchop1614  [author] 12 Oct, 2014 @ 12:07pm 
I am not sure. I just thought that was the general definition of Liberalism.
The Establishment 12 Oct, 2014 @ 7:55am 
Not so sure were you're getting that from. Classicly liberal would be a mild class of libertarian. But I know that in plenty of foreign countries it doesn't mean that anymore. What country or region would you say that it still means what it meant in the classical sense?
Chopchop1614  [author] 11 Oct, 2014 @ 1:48pm 
hhhmmmm
Jakobb 11 Oct, 2014 @ 9:45am 
LordofFreedom wrote:
>Liberals as a whole tend to support more regulation than freedom.
Only in the US, my friend. Only in the USA, where "liberal" means something very different than it does in the rest of the world. For translation, where you read "liberal", think a mild case of "libertarian".
Chopchop1614  [author] 6 Oct, 2014 @ 11:59am 
Yeah.
The Establishment 6 Oct, 2014 @ 11:45am 
The words freedom and liberal onbly coincide when refering to social freedoms. Liberals as a whole tend to support more regulation than freedom. Thus the point of my original sarcastic comment on your decision to name the liberals love you scenario "Free World"
Chopchop1614  [author] 6 Oct, 2014 @ 7:55am 
@lordoffreedom3 YES FINALLY I totally agree that's how it all works! Your such an angel to this argument lordoffreedom and I only thought you were a liberal because of your name LordOfFreedom. See?
Chopchop1614  [author] 6 Oct, 2014 @ 7:54am 
It plays amazing adds in some great features :D
The Establishment 6 Oct, 2014 @ 3:31am 
Go away can't you see we're having an argument here?
James009 5 Oct, 2014 @ 11:05pm 
So, this mod looks interesting. Does it play well? All I can see in the chat is people arguing.
The Establishment 5 Oct, 2014 @ 2:19pm 
loss.brad, seriously? You simply don't seem rational enough to argue with.
"Corporations are evil!" *Chug a coke* "They only opress the poor and do nothing good for anyone!" *Chug another coke* " "I think all corporations should be banned because the have only hurt others!" *Post reply on Microsoft computer*
The Establishment 5 Oct, 2014 @ 2:13pm 
Now, there are of course, there are exceptions. But the exceptions are dramatically outweighed, and in case somebody gets really screwed over, we have welfare systems to catch them so that they don't hit the ground too hard.

P.S. Seriously how did you not get that I was joking? Are you guys just used to liberals being that annoying? Mark Fist? Donald Paegan? Come on.
The Establishment 5 Oct, 2014 @ 2:13pm 
And if the employees paychecks are faultering to an intolerable rate because of this, they have every right to quit and find a new company. Now, you might say that the CEO isn't putting in anywhere near is much effort as his employees are. And you would be completely right. But think of it this way: One, very dedicated laborer, spends 23 hours every day of blood, sweat, and tears, digging a hole and his back yard. Another person spends an hour and a half every day washing cars. The latter person gets paid more than the former. This is because, even though the former man put in a greater amount of effort, the hole he dug didn't do anywhere near as much good for the society as all the car washings did. You see, in a capitalist system, all money really is is a measurement of good that a person has done for the people around him.
The Establishment 5 Oct, 2014 @ 2:11pm 
Ok plot twist I'm not a liberal, I was doing an over the top liberal impression as a joke and I honestly expected someone to pick up on that by now. But then Magelord came in and I could no longer stand it. First of all, Sir Oswald, calling people a socialist faggot is neither effective nor very PC. As for you, magelord, I can see the things you find objectionable, but the fact is that while the the CEOs of corporations may not put in 300 times as much work as his employees, his work is 300 times as valuable. Yes, the company could not run without it's employees, but it also could not run without it's employer. There are thousands of employees. There is one employer. Therefore, because his skills carry as much importance as over 300 employees, he is payed more than 300 employees.
Chopchop1614  [author] 5 Oct, 2014 @ 11:20am 
hhm
✶ Fitz001 ✶ 5 Oct, 2014 @ 11:15am 
@ChopChopMc Socalism can exist without a universal income
Chopchop1614  [author] 5 Oct, 2014 @ 11:05am 
Im an athiest and capitalism is about getting money for working hard. How do you expect order to stay if everyone got paid the same amount. The slacker got paid the same amount as the star employee?
✶ Fitz001 ✶ 5 Oct, 2014 @ 9:55am 
I got to agree with loss.brad
loss.brad 4 Oct, 2014 @ 3:19pm 
capitalism is only about the greedy and evil among the populace getting all the money and power and then using that to keep everyone else down with the illusion that they might get rich too. it is the most evil economic system known to man, and even the top religious officials know it! let's stop kidding ourselves and start seeing the whole forest, not just the trees...

oh and yes, i am definitely saying that if you are a Christian and a capitalist then you're clearly not a good Christian! it's just a simple, undeniable fact that everyone likes to ignore all the time.
Chopchop1614  [author] 3 Oct, 2014 @ 12:32pm 
I should stream on twitch or something where we all just sit down and discuss politics
Chopchop1614  [author] 3 Oct, 2014 @ 12:31pm 
There was no need for that launguage @siroswold
jawncarlo 3 Oct, 2014 @ 12:02pm 
Oh my godh. I just wanted to see if this was a good mod and theres this hugePOLITICAL DEBATE!
Chopchop1614  [author] 3 Oct, 2014 @ 9:02am 
@MagelordExelbirth I guess so. I dont support the big coperations but I support capitalism.
Magelord Exelbirth 3 Oct, 2014 @ 8:29am 
@ChopChopMc I know, but capitalism leads directly to corporatism, which is pretty unfortunate. The only way I know of to go backwards from corporatism would be through socialist means, and I think socialist ideas are the only way to prevent corporatism from happening in a capitalist society.

Funny side note: a study was done recently to determine what kind of economy US citizens would prefer. They were shown 3 graphs: the first showing how the US economy currently is (with CEO's making over 300 times as much as employees); the second showed the idealized US economy the surveyed people thought up earlier (CEO's making 7 times as much as employees); the third showed Sweden's economy. 92% of the people surveyed picked the Sweden graph.
Chopchop1614  [author] 3 Oct, 2014 @ 8:12am 
@MagelordExelbirth But Capitalism is not about making huge money for little effort its about making lots of money for lots of effort. I disagree entirely with the CEOs of the banks and things. You do not have to agree with those points to be a Capitalist.
Magelord Exelbirth 3 Oct, 2014 @ 8:09am 
@lordoffreedom3 No, obama's not a bad president because he's black. But he is a bad president because he's very pro-corporation, and constantly tries to take the middle ground between the democrat and republican party, which has failed since he took office, rather than lead.

@ChopChopMc I agree with the part about fairness and getting paid for the effort you put in. Which is why I don't agree with capitalism. Capitalism is fine to a point, and the US passed that point a long time ago. Now, all the CEO's make huge amounts of money for very little effort, whereas the workers get very little money for an ever increasing demand for their effort.
Chopchop1614  [author] 1 Oct, 2014 @ 1:14pm 
... ... ... I believe strongly in freedom but I believe more so in fairness. Getting paid for the amount of effort you put in. Working fairly. If you would like to have a giveaway this weekend spam the comments to remind me and I will giveaway a load of games on stream! Maybe while doing my first podcast! If you want it spam the comments.
The Establishment 1 Oct, 2014 @ 12:14pm 
What!!! You'e a capitalist! Dude! I thought you were a fellow liberal! How could you do this? Don't you know that conservativism is out of style? What do you have against Obama? You racist! Just cuz he's black doesnt mean he's a bad president. Haven't you heard of "From every man accordian to his umbrella tree, to every accordian to his knee?" I don't know who that's from, but I know it was somebody famous! Like Joe Biden! All hail Joe Biden!
Chopchop1614  [author] 28 Sep, 2014 @ 1:12pm 
Thanks for the replies. lordoffreedom3 I don't agree with you at all. The capitalists like people getting more money for working harder. I might be biased considering I am a capitalist myself but I dont think everyone hates them.
Ron Johnson 27 Sep, 2014 @ 5:40pm 
No situation where conservitives love you?
Bamboozled Weasel 27 Sep, 2014 @ 5:04pm 
Interesting Mod and good work too. It would be interesting if you could make a mod where you could train and fund a secret police to protect you from the groups that hate you. Also a mod where you can ban certain types of economic patterns would be interesting. Banning Communisim or Socialistic Capitlaisim would be a facinating take as well as others suggested. You could set up a dictatorship on economic policies.
Anyways thanks for the mod. I will be happy to explore it.
The Establishment 26 Sep, 2014 @ 12:30pm 
Also could you make a mod that removes the capitalists? I mean, nobody likes those people. They always complain about personal property and the rights of the individual and all that crud. And can anybody tell me why the hell everybody keeps quoting that old cowboy actor? Donald Paegan? IDK. And what's a mark fist? Everybody always calls me a mark fist.
Chopchop1614  [author] 24 Sep, 2014 @ 11:31pm 
Thanks for the feedback. I could add that along with q9888's idea. lordoffreedom3 if you want to learn how to make a mod you should check out my channel www.youtube.com/user/AlphaGCentral I go into depth on how to make policies in part 1