NORTH SAWYER SHOOT DOWN WAS JUST A MISTAKE. SNS DRAMATIZED IT
GLORY TO NORTH SAWYER!!!!!

So NeatNaut lore exist?

Southwest Sawyer main airline of South Sawyer?

Oh yeah this exist

Stormworks: Build whatever, It's a sandbox

@gaming go kart Great news...........this is a building game......go build something yourself.

Worst plane ever no fly

checklists

how to take off

Opal shaders

how did you get you're game to look so good

what shader do you use for the screen shots

nvm found the keypad

great plane but how do i use the autopilot or is there one?

3) Yeah that is mostly because of trim and the high speed. I would highly recommend using the airbrakes (key [3]), they help slow it down. Also, feel free to go to 0% with the throttle, the plane can glide just fine.

Thanks for the report, if there is anything else you think could be fixed or you need help with, just ask :)

1) I would recommend using both the stabilizers or trimming the plane. As for the stalling - you are flying the plane how it's not meant to be flown. This is not an average stormworks plane, it is built to stall when the drag is higher than the lift value. This is usually around 15° of pitch at 200 kts and 0° flap. But thanks for pointing this out, I don't think I've actually specified this in the description, so I will do that right now :D

2) The alt. hold isn't really strong, but if you just give it a push and make it not fall from the sky, the plane will stabilize. Additionally, the alt. hold doesn't act unless the desired altitude is within reach (500 ft). If it is not, I would recommend hand flying it near the altitude or using the alt. change mode.

the controls of this aircraft (as well as the executive variant i can see you've uploaded) seem to be... what's the word... unstable? it's a struggle to enter a stable turn without stalling the alarm / triggering alarms.

additionally, the altitude hold seems to like pointing the nose toward the ground even when i'm below the alt it needs to climb to (i try to set around 3000ft) so this might also worth be looking into.

lastly, trying to land with the config you've specified seems to be damn near impossible. that said, i realize i'm yet to try trimming the plane out, so will give that a shot.

if these could please be looked into, this would be much appreciated :)

you should use UATC :P

The most heated comment section on a ws vehicle I've seen in a while

Thank you!!

Super great plane man really appreciate all the hard work and time put into it

I will now use this door for the great underground room in which I keep these intellectual and constructive comments from people like you :D

Now, we have a complex door, but it’s not complicated enough to use, so, I add a lock and a system for it to be disabled from the bridge of the ship it is in. Then, I also realise a good, strong door uses hydraulics, so I make a complex system with engine-driven hydraulics. Don’t forget, the engine needs a complicated startup procedure! And as a final touch, I also like to add a buzzer that sounds when the door is being opened/closed.

@force A tratt, Yees, I do, in fact, enjoy making complex doors. I usually first start with a set number switchbox connected from the button to the pivot. Then, I usually make that button a push button, only so that I can make the door even more complex with a push-to-toggle block. Then, I prepare my set number switchbox for my next addition/redesign: I make the door first slide out and then slide to the side, timing it perfectly using capacitors. For extra measure, I also make the door anchored via a hardpoint when it’s closed.

fuck efficiency

more buttone = more fun

Force a tratt. You are the type of person who receives someone else's work for free and still bitch about it. It you don't like it....don't use it!

If it is not to your liking, guess what. This is a building game......build you own build.

youre the type of person to crap on others builds just because it wasnt started in one second

i bet your the type of person to make a door harder to build then a car.

Then don’t use it. I won’t let workshop people dictate how I should build my creations, fact is, I just like it this way. Some people like it, and some don’t, that doesn’t mean that it being over-engineered is something inherently bad.

this plane is so over-engineered that its just not efficient to use.

Did you stall the plane?

i really love this plane. though i had problems with the prop vanishing on my screen. I would love to know if this is only a me thing or everyone is having this happen

@pugen, Opal shader, find it on Nexusmods

@EightHorse8357, That would be super difficult to set up with such a small plane, so unfortunately, no.

how do you get render distance that far

i can fly with my hotas?

dam you created the lour backstory and the flight manual

@ʝιɱ ƚԋҽ ριʅσƚ #FixTf2, @VolishTenis, thanks

@Diadem V, I enjoy my lore

Probably unfortunately won't be able to change it now

@NT-242, Yeah that is true. They are optional during taxiing (the checklist that you found it in), but I forgot to put them in the take-off checklist.

Nice

[V.I] "How much lore will you be putting behind this vehicle?"
"Yes."

note on the landing lights on the checklist that should not be optional, irl procedures require you to have them on while on the runway and below transition altitudes

nice

Thank you Vlaskovich!

awesome

Thanks!

Looks nice, best of luck on later builds!

Thank you!