Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Please keep us posted on an update if you get time:)
There is no point of having your general in a fight because he will die real fast.
1) are you planning to remake victory points in settlement battles? In vanilla attacker holding even one victory point gives insane stacking morale debuff to defenders. It's the one of the things that feels among the greatest disrepancies from the early titles
2) are you planning to introduce a treshold of losses beneath which an unit is wiped out after a battle? eg. >10% soldiers left of max 180 - unit wiped out after a battle. This was present in earlier titles as well
3) are you planning to make forts remain in owner's hands after enemy taking a province, like Tribal Outposts do?
Please don't consider this as a list of demands, I respect your vision and understand these might be much harder or simply impossible to introduce. I wish you many luck with your future work!