Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
my main suggestion is making Spain a vassal of France given that's what Napoleon's goal was after all with Spain
Avoiding a potential winter campaign by beginning the offensive in spring, thereby giving themselves more time before the harsh winter.
Secondly, focusing on the western part of Russia (the Baltics and Poland).
Thirdly, supporting the Decembrist movements (which began as early as 1810) and backing separatists in Ukraine dissatisfied with the abolition of the Hetmanate in 1764.
The key battles, in my view, would be the battle for Vilnius, the blockade of Riga, and the battle near Pskov, from where the French later directed their forces toward St. Petersburg.
The prolonged defense and eventual capture of Pskov would have marked a major defeat for the Russian Empire, as the city is located at the crossroads of important routes linking western regions to the capital.
Although Napoleon won the war, was it worth it given the heavy loss of soldiers?