Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If the option to refuse is added, the decision would make no sense because why would anyone accept their vassal becoming independent without any cost? Both the AI and the player would always choose "No," which is the most logical option. The idea of not having a way to refuse is to balance the game and penalize players who expand too quickly through conquests, without worrying about the culture and religion of the regions they conquer, since that’s one of the requirements.
for the other stuff, not to hard to add, ill look into it
Now it's a 💣 bomb 💥 😜
Could just move it up towards an Alliance with improved opinion, eg negative (your liege gets assurance you don't get anything), ( >0 , 2 way ), 60+ Alliance.
I appreciate very much your effort to give more realism to the game avoiding cheating 🙂
In my opinion Memories should also be upgraded a bit...