Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
*Trying to take a settler some barbs took from a rival.
Wow 2000+ subs, awesome! \d(^.^)b/
So for these reasons, I'm thinking maybe having capture of Settlers work for us the same as default for Barbarians: they become Workers. Does that sound right/Is that doable?
was this meant to be used with the R.E.D pack because a tile by itself means that the tiles around it means to be not owned by it's owned team.
@Christy15, I did not change it
@GameBeast, I do agree, to make it more realistic they should be destroyed, ill keep that in mind
One question : if I expand a captured great artist, for example, to create a great work of art, will the great work be from my civ, or from the civ the great artist belonged to in the first place ?
Thanks. :)