Not a neutral mod. It's legit "ancap good, ancom bad".

WOOOO ANCAPISTAN!!!! WOOOOOOOOO!!!

Cheers. Yeah, I'll try to get on that.

I unistalled and reinstalled both the mod and the game, so that's probably why the files are missing, but what's concerning is that when I resubscribe to the mod the files didn't come back. Maybe the mod is outdated? I don't know. By the way, good job on 100 comments.!

Thanks for the nice comment Maybe. I have had some problems too. Perhaps a recent update to Democracy 3? I've been having problems too. But haven'tupdated the files so I don;t know why they would be missing.

For some reason the mod won't download. It doesn't show the mod in my Democracy 3 folder. This mod was the only reason the game was fun to me (because the scenarios at the start didn't let you customize the country enough).

Ancapistan here i come!

Kinda happy this exist.... hard for me to play because im not a fallower of any branch of anarchy.... but ancaps are the HIV of the world tbh

Because I use logic instead of subscribing to ideologies

Interesting. You're pretty hard to pin down ill give you that.

No. I don't believe in a stateless solution

Just straight up anarchist?

No. I just don't believe in money. I think it's stupid and distorts the perspective of demand.

Mutualist?

definately not a facsist

Fascist?

I'm not a communist, but I am an anti-capitalist.

golly i wonder if mod author is capitalist or communist hmm

That "40% of the wealth" is in factories and the economy, isn't it? They don't have 40% of the resources and land in the country in mansions.

Anarcho capitalism is political version of flat earthers.

If the state don't make the poor dependent, then they'll die. If it isn't obvious, the majority of the U.S population is living dangerously close to the poverty line, and it's only getting worse by the day.

The rich, the 1%, owns more than 40% of the populations wealth. The funniest thing about this, is the fact that the "1%" is more like the 0.57%.

The state makes the poor dependent and stifles them with market regulation. How in god's name would getting rid of it *hurt* them??

This is the reason why lighting mcqueen died ;(

I still can't initiate AnCapism without fucking everything up and loosing the election.

An-Caps, fascists? That's the most retarded thing i've read. No, An-Caps are just too ignorant to see what their beliefs will end with.

No government controll of businesses, no government intervention will lead to these same businesses going rampant and forcing people into slave labour (Literally). Polute the air, and destroy our eco-systen.

I do understand why some people would go AnCap, it looks good on paper. It's just fucking retarded when you go into depth with what's wrong about it.

I'll think about it :)

could you add a direct download link plz

Thanks for replying, great mod and have a nice day :)

I like the idea of anarchotranshumanists too. I will be sure to add that.

Both the effects of the ancoms and an caps are positive and negative in effect. It a matter of how the choose to express themselves as the reason for the color. Ancaps express themselves by creating new businesses (postive) although the hurt the poor and weaken sovereignty. The ancoms burn sh*t and protest (negative). They are of course always there. You just notice (as situations) in these states. Each one serves their function of indicating problems with you country.

Thanks blackwolf100 I think that is a good idea

You need to make both of them nominal situations or green or something because otherwise it is partisan. Just a bit of personal criticism.
Also, are there going to be new forms of anarchy such as anarcho-tanshumanists if you rely on AI for everything, have high tech, and high automation? Or anarcho-primitivists living in the woods or stuff like that?

Left Anarchy is a viable stateless society. Anarcho Capitalism is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgyhB5n2QXM
hahahaha Fuck ancaps. They're just fascists who want to smoke weed.

left anarchy for the win

Ancoms contribute quite a lot to the betterment of society, while ancaps pretty much don't exist outside the internet

AnCaps are seen as good, AnComs are seen as bad. Thats a very biased attitude if Ive ever seen one. Good job on the propaganda mod.

Fuck Ancaps

Woah~ Calm down comrade, you're spamming the comment section.

And no, Ancaps are semi-Anarchists, what they promote is essentially neo-feudalism with two steps backwards.

Ancaps are anarchists lol

I am not a libertarian. Therefor, I do not agree with many of the ideas presented in this mod. There should never be one path to victory. Maybe acheive DeLeonism, or anarcho-communism, or even anarcho-syndicalism. There is never just one way to solve all of a country's problems. Keep that in mind as you update this mod. If the only way to solve problems is by going with the ancaps, the only people who will stay subscribed are libertarians and ancaps.

It would be nice if there’s an option to go full private mode, like have a private army, private law, private eyes, even private cops to support capitalist, some liberals and ancaps, all independent from founding from the government. The missions are pretty unforgiving to calm down the ancoms and socialist, so the mod is a bit overkill on the difficulty, thou some new polices be nice to help out.
Overall, the mod is challenging yet pleasing to see ancaps to help out the economics, just be interesting if you can have more policies for support ancaps (and yes even ancoms to be fair).

Not too bad mod, bit little chooses but not bad.

Ancaps are the stupidiest people ever

No problem. But I still think you should make both green. I am genuinely too stupid to mod games, otherwise I would do it myself. I would do it if I wasn't too lazy. (Maybe communism makes me lazy after all :D )

Thanks for the constructive comments @HUNDmiau

"Crimes should be increased by both "an"caps and ancoms. While ancoms are more likely to do crimes like burglary or breaking in, even violent crimes, "an"caps are still promoting crimes from the perspective of the state. They support hacking, tax-evading, not-following the day to day law etc. "an"coms should increase crimes more though, since we advocate more crimes, or at least crimes from the perspective of a state. (We think those "crimes" are justified) "

The AnCaps actually do increase black markets and taxevasion, but this information is hidden from the player durring gameplay

""an"caps should reduce currency strenght, since "an"caps don't think it is justified to enforce a currency and that the free market should also apply to currencies. " <- I really like that. Thanks!

Crimes should be increased by both "an"caps and ancoms. While ancoms are more likely to do crimes like burglary or breaking in, even violent crimes, "an"caps are still promoting crimes from the perspective of the state. They support hacking, tax-evading, not-following the day to day law etc. "an"coms should increase crimes more though, since we advocate more crimes, or at least crimes from the perspective of a state. (We think those "crimes" are justified)
I could do a more thought-through list if you want to, but those are some ideas for a less biased, more realistic version. (When we'd go full realism, "an"caps would make everyone unhappy but the rich and wealthy, would insta police state you and create poverty aswell as unemployment)

"an"caps should reduce currency strenght, since "an"caps don't think it is justified to enforce a currency and that the free market should also apply to currencies. (Like in Feudal Times, and no, this is one of the few times I am not comparing "Anarcho"-capitalism to Feudalism for Ideaological reasons: Feudal Times and early capitalist times had this thing going. Every bank was able to print their own "money")Both "An"caps and ancoms should displease and reduce the number of liberals. Neither of them likes them, and both at lest claim to be able to convert them easily. (Even though from observations, ancoms seem to be able to do it more efficently)
Poverty should not cause "an"caps. No poor person will say that a more free market will save him. (Or did any Revolution of the peasent create a more capitalist society?)

It is good that both ancaps and ancoms give classwar. But classwar should increase ancom. Ancoms should boost productivity indirectly, no decrease it, through a different mode of production. This would need a different bubble called common ownership or Workers-Cooperatives, since those are the things ancoms advocate and we know for a fact that those did improve the productivity drasticly. Look at the economy of anarchist spain in the civil war. This economic boom was wonderful. Both ancaps and ancoms should reduce taxation, but ancaps more than ancoms since ancoms are more likely to pay taxes in this system than "an"caps are, because ancoms say that taxation is somewhat important as some money goes to social programms. Still lots of ancoms refuse to pay taxes to fund this unjust system.

And now, some real ideas for this mod: (And yes, I am an ancom, and yes this is a somewhat biased answer. But I tried my best to be a little bit less biased than you)
First of all, make both "an"caps and ancoms green events. Then give both of them a fitting description how they see themselves, then make sure the one reduces the other at least a little. Or did you ever see "an"caps getting along with ancoms? Even though "an"caps should reduce ancoms less than ancom reduces "an"caps to show trend to anarcho-communism. More people turn to anarchism, while the people supporting "anarcho"-capitalism is more or less stable with only little change. The causes for ancom are good. "An"caps should be caused by the rich, since the rich people are more likely to advocate a system where their wealth can achieve more and can be used more freely. (Also rich people would benefit more from an "anarcho"-capitalist system)