Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Ok... sorry for that, but since you have many rotor's that higlight with different colors element's on those other grid, I was misleaded by the thousands of colors of the K menu. :D
5. It has Hydrogen Thrusters, not atmo. Atmo do nothing in space and are more space consuming than ions. The original Mk. I had 100% Ions because that was all that was out, and when I was testing the flight strength of the Mk. II it had serious issues inside atmospheres because even the slightest tilt caused it to tip and sink aggressively, so I kicked the ions out. About the lack of solid fuel, the Scylla was not been to be that durable, only a fast response hit-and-run style bomber that got in, did her buisiness, and got out, usually to a rally point or an outpost it can refuel at. The generators are only to refuel but should not be relied on.
Any other questions or things I missed?
3. The auto healing only covers key areas like where the interior decoys are and keeping the bombing platform healthy for as long as possible.
I'm happy to cooperate with your questions, and I'll try to answer them as best I can.
1. Yes, it is 100% relient on hydrogen, but I wanted it to be a nice feature that it can operate inside of atmospheres (Even if only for a short time) but I did not actually test the durability of the reserves. I know for a fact that even with cargo onboard the upward thrust is enough to counteract the planet's pull and then some but how fast the fuel reserve will burn I do not know. One feature that relates to this a bit is that I spent a good deal of time putting in an extending landing gear system that can allow it to rest of the surface and save fuel that way or even stopping to mine ice, escentially roosting.
Damn Character Limit
And since cruisers are very rare on the workshop (and if there are some, are almost outdated atm) I'm very interested.
1) The ship relay a lot on hydrogen thrusters, did you tested it in survival on how much time the ship goes on before hydro tanks deplete?
2) Why 1 single decoy on a rotor? It can be repaired by some hidden welders?
3) What does exactly your welders repair?
4) While my cruiser hit the limits of mass (7kt and 120+m) and lenght to be classified as cruiser, your's seems more a frigate (with your 3.6kt mass) then a cruiser
5) It does have atmo thrusters but not ion thrusers, again isn't too risky to relay almost exclusively on hydrogen thrusters? 6 oxygen generators cannot replenish the tank with more or the same amout of hydrogen used by thrusers at the same time, you know that.