Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The ai fully use all changes made the same as the player.
but i doubt anything major. ony edits arrows n their damage
- i went for the climate ideal- but the bitch is i cant make it so persian units basicly cant shoot bows in the west, and the west get fucked in the east lol
-- some units have the efects slightly diferent becouse of bow type. as i heavility edited he bows to reflect the full onslaught they bring. to the time era.
i find they really fuck you up and make you go after the archers. and thats really, what you should be doing in a battle v the archer nations.
wasent trying to mock you or anything, just saying it pisses me off too!
I mean, yes, there's something to be said for realism, and I don't disagree with your reasoning nor your intentions there and have plenty of background likewise. However, this is also a game, and from someone who spent multiple comments complaining about how overpowered javelins were I perhaps (apparently incorrectly) expected some consideration of game balancing, even if it maybe needed to be a little inventive (as this rather nice mod has been), rather than hiding behind the shield of realism while deathly critical arrows fly at you. (Oh ho, mod wit.)
So I hope you'll take these compliments along with the little bit of criticisms in kind.
Ah, yes, "condescension." We know thee well.