Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Pomerelia wasn't part of the HRE and didn't have such strong economic ties with states in it, so germanisation wasn't as strong in the XII, XIII centuries as in eg. Silesia or polish Western/german Hinter (Back) Pomerania. When the Teutons took over, they already encountered a "developed" local feudal society (unlike the prussians, who were still functioning as tribes), so the Ostsiedlung on their part wasn't as intense.
Prussia's original population had been slowly exterminated/assimilated since the Teutons took over (five prussian uprisings decimated martial and economic resistance) and over time the north coastal flat regions and the western Vistula bordering lands were dominated by germanic settlers (who dominated also most urban settlements too), the south-east was settled by refugees from Mazovia (they became the Mazurs later, the protestant poles of Prussia) and in the east there remained mainly indegenous baltic communities (who also motted the rest of Prussia, comprising at the beginning of the XV century some 50% of the total population).
In Pomerelia (east Pomerania) germanisation hadn't proceeded as much - the very cities that were founded on Mageburg law were germanic, as the settlers were invited from modern day Germany (but so was the majority of Krakow, the capital of Poland, in the XIV century and pretty much each city east of the Elbe river that was founded on Magedburg rights). Ubranisation at that time was low in general, 10-20 percent lived in cities in Poland (in Prussia it was around 20-30), the rest of the population that was relatively indigenous lived in the countryside.
That's great, I'm glad to hear it.
Basically you just want to mimic what you see in the Steam install. Your file structure should look like the games files.
Good luck, I'm looking forward to seeing what you come up with
But you should download and use Notepad ++ for all of your coding, it's great and free
Give it a shot.
I'll take a look at your file when you upload if it isn't working and help.
Hmm I'm not sure about a guide
wiki [www.eu4wiki.com] has a section on modding cultures and culture groups, which you may have seen.
To change the province in an actual provinces you do this:
1. go to \Steam\SteamApps\common\Europa Universalis IV\history\provinces\
2. find the file with the province you want to change
3. copy the file into your mod's history\provinces\
(to get started with just unzip this mod, change the title and use the structure)
4. open the file in yoru mod's directory with Notepad ++
5. navigate to the entry 'culture = XXXX' where XXXX is the name of the culture
6. replace the XXX with the culture of your choice.
So if we take Uplland as an example, I could replace culture = swedish with culture = finnish.
7. save and you are done.
4. Similar vein, yes Maltese has linguistic influence from other languages derived from long periods of occupation, but I'm not sure that the Maltese would consider themselves culturally affiliated with Tunisia over the rest of Italy.
Moreover, I'd encourage you to make your own mod. This is not rocket science. You have to change one entry in each provence history file to change a culture. I'm available if you have questions. Thanks again for the feedback and good luck!
Good thoughts, I think Zucklov has addressed in the main mod page
My take:
1. There is no reliable population data for the Ottoman empire during that period. It is impossible to say in what areas Armenians were a majority or not. Could be right, or not, but it is not something that I have data for. The best we have is 1900s Turkish data, which is imperfect.
2. Changes other than culture are not part of the LITE version
3. Yes, there is a linguistic link between Magyar and other Finno-Ugric languages. But is that really a cultural link? I think about it this way: If Hungary occupied Finland would the Finns feel like it was occupation by their cousins or by a foreign power. I'm thinking foreign power. Whatever the linguistic connect it doesn't really reach the level of cultural group connection.
6. Similar to Hungarian, Maltese has closer linguistic links to Tunisia and North Africa than Italy (other than religion).
All these comments are made of the images given, so if any of my interpretations are incorrect, please forgive my ignorence. I am also going to post these improvements to the original mod so it will both be similar.
Once again, thanks for updating the mod I am going to have so much fun XD XD
1. The Armenian culture was larger (mainly westwards) before the Armenian Genocide, so a little improvement could be more Armenian culture provinces between the Pontic and Cappadocian cultures. This is shown by maps on www.historyplace.com/worldhistory/genocide/armenians.htm
2. Why is there Anglo-Saxon culture (I think it is) within England. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxons suggests that what we know as 'Anglo-Saxon' was no longer present and both the people and nobles began changing society into the 'Middle-English' culture.
You'd think that wouldn't have been so tough... haha
... I just got it...
Glad you like the mod! What's OCT?
Comments about those specifics are probably best directed to the content's author, I'm just hosting his content here and porting it to use in Organic Culture Transmission
like the german parts you say beling to the polish culture group