Store Page
Train Simulator Classic 2024
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews

Train Simulator Classic 2024

Store Page
Train Simulator Classic 2024 >  Workshop > DPSimulation's Workshop > [DPS] 2D90 - 0821 Beckenham Junction to London Victoria
[DPS] 2D90 - 0821 Beckenham Junction to London Victoria
Description Discussions0 Comments11 Change Notes
11 Comments
< >
danieltindall 9 Sep, 2023 @ 3:50pm 
The timetable was a little tight in 1 or 2 places, but other than that it was fine. I liked how every time an AI train approached, we were told where it was going.
DPSimulation  [author] 1 Apr, 2017 @ 3:35am 
Thanks wacdag.
wacdag 1 Apr, 2017 @ 3:32am 
No problem. I'm glad I'm not the only one then! I have download the same scenario pack from your website as I'm a fan of the content that you have provided over the years :)
DPSimulation  [author] 1 Apr, 2017 @ 2:44am 
This has been reported on other scenarios and is down to the scenario not downloading/installing correctly. The only solution is to unsubscribe then physically make sure the scenario is completely removed from your system before trying again. In some cases it took a few tries, unfortunately it is out of my control.
wacdag 1 Apr, 2017 @ 2:12am 
Recently downloaded this but the scenario starts just after mignight (and not 8:20am) and none of the consists move at all resulting me in being stuck outside Victoria waiting for the points to switch which they never do. Any help would be appriciated :)
DPSimulation  [author] 27 May, 2016 @ 1:13am 
In your opinion of course. As it was released seperately and afterwards, I wouldn't be so certain.
Walter White 26 May, 2016 @ 4:52pm 
@DPSimulation Most owners of London-Faversham would have the Sheerness + Class 466 anyway.
Scouser888 23 May, 2016 @ 11:27am 
Despite my earlier misgivings, I am begininng to know and enjoy this route a lot, thanks to this creator, and scenarios like this. Once again, very enjoyable, with logical use of signals and AI traffic. Highly recommend and thank you for doing this.
ash 23 May, 2016 @ 4:34am 
Nice scenario, thanks for sharing.
DPSimulation  [author] 23 May, 2016 @ 1:00am 
Hi Joe. I was aware, it was just to limit requirements.
Joethefish 23 May, 2016 @ 12:52am 
Hi DPSimulation, I just wanted to point out that the Class 466 has a different model to the 465/0-1. So I recommend using the Sheerness add-on for a 466, instead.