Source Filmmaker

Source Filmmaker

(SFM) War SFX pack
109 Comments
ncuxuka 14 Jun, 2023 @ 12:47pm 
this SFX is really awesome
KomradeDoot 4 Oct, 2022 @ 1:32am 
what kind of tank is that in the poster?
痛みHOPELESS死 5 May, 2022 @ 12:29pm 
How I can talk with pepper?
痛みHOPELESS死 5 May, 2022 @ 12:28pm 
please
痛みHOPELESS死 6 Jan, 2022 @ 11:48am 
how did u export bc2 audio files?
76561198838078783 25 Mar, 2020 @ 7:32am 
o_o
recommn [3D Commissions] 26 Dec, 2018 @ 7:03am 
Aye mate, I want to thank you for this collection of sounds. And also to notify you (if for some unbelievable reason you still remember) that this idea of making a series about a sniper with low expierence of our own is long gone. Gotta admit you were right about scenarios and all this stuff, but still.

Merry Christmas :p
recommn [3D Commissions] 7 Jan, 2018 @ 5:06am 
Good stuff, partner.
PanzerPlant 6 Oct, 2017 @ 10:23am 
If I knew how to animate, I'd definitely use these.
SamiSha 30 Aug, 2017 @ 1:03pm 
chap
iwaa 30 Aug, 2017 @ 8:56am 
Don't call me chap
SamiSha 22 Aug, 2017 @ 3:16pm 
Bump
xX_Infernal_Wizard_Xx 22 Aug, 2017 @ 8:14am 
thx it good
birb 1 Jun, 2017 @ 2:10pm 
were did u find that tank
it closely rezembles the british churchill MK IIV
Gasoline 12 Jan, 2017 @ 12:02am 
{Cont'd from below comment...}

Surfer, I get where you're coming from and your intentions as Curly said are good, HOWEVER, if you do not own the copyright it's not YOUR place to make it. "Why wait for them to realize when I can do it myself?" Because it's claiming to be someone you aren't, claiming that you own the piece -sfx, music, etc.- and THAT can be considered perjury or even identity fruad {loosely but not definitively}. You want to rid the Workshop of bad things and that's admirable but there's a right and wrong way. DMCA-ing this you dislike, disagree with, feel it's your job to white knight, isn't the right way, simple.

Personal opinion, Clementine, I get your anger, but move the fuck on. From reading the comments you were using a song...that was under heavy copyright watch and you got snagged. Surfer, if it's not YOURS -meaning you created it and own the copyrights- don't DMCA, report it. Simple. It can be seen as perjury or even fraud so, just be careful if I were you.
Gasoline 12 Jan, 2017 @ 12:01am 
Just waltzed by this on my daily Workshop look through for stuff. And couldn't help but read the argument, and I'm gonna play devil's advocate and then give my opinion.

Clementine, I understand where you're coming from, however, what Surfer is saying is, if you've posted something -music or otherwise- that was protected -heavily- you deserved the DMCA strike, point blank period. Fair Use is both solid and rocky, because from my personal understanding it's still being questioned "What is fair use?" so it leaves a very gray area that can fuck you over.

{Cont'd...}
Krunga 7 Jan, 2017 @ 5:41pm 
Okay. One question.

Let's say I make my own models and upload them. Will you DMCA it? Because you're really DMCA Happy.
SamiSha 7 Jan, 2017 @ 12:39pm 
Thanks, I always knew I was mature.
surfer171  [author] 7 Jan, 2017 @ 12:36pm 
And prove it bottom feeder, I dare you with photographic evidence. Unless you don't have and just throw empty claims then I'm laughing my heart out for your incompetency to show them.
Krunga 7 Jan, 2017 @ 12:33pm 
Nah, I'm just making a CSGO skin. Which is 100x more fun than seeing you try to avoid commiting Perjury.
surfer171  [author] 7 Jan, 2017 @ 12:31pm 
Well… are you gonna speak up or forfeit? Cause I'm smelling a freshly baked white flag coming from your comically tiny brain
Krunga 7 Jan, 2017 @ 12:24pm 
God damn...
surfer171  [author] 7 Jan, 2017 @ 12:23pm 
And on what ground are you to tell me I commit perjury in this workshop? The fnaf flood of 2015 you're speaking off? Or is it the 2016 fnaf retexturing pandemic? Either way, what I said those past 1 & 2 years ago are true and I don't think there's any relevant article I actually commit perjury.

1) it's your fault, with every field carefully written with external links to quotes and proof of source that leads to infringement would be entitled to success to winning the case. Besides, it was you who dragged yourself to the fiery hell hole of the copyright law for uploading the lazy town song.

2) why don't you look yourself at a mirror, I think you can tell by all the comments you've posted unless you gag at every words you typed then shame on you.

3) still, you've got no good come backs from your miserable behind
Krunga 7 Jan, 2017 @ 12:09pm 
You're commiting Purjery. I tried to tell you this long before Curly came in here that you're trying to copyright claim something that isn't yours.

"Won a copyright case"
You didn't win it. The DMCA's don't allow the person on the other end defend against it.

"Proved you being arrogant"
Arrogant how?

"Proved you've got zero ideas on a decent comeback"
But you use shitty stereotypes. That there says you have nothing else.
surfer171  [author] 7 Jan, 2017 @ 12:06pm 
You know, if your plan is to mess with me, you're basically messing with the wrong guy.

Let me see:

Won a copyright case

Proved you being arrogant

Proved you've got zero ideas on a decent comeback

Now pack up kid, let curly and I do our talking until we come to a solid conclusion
Krunga 7 Jan, 2017 @ 12:03pm 
Also forgot to add Sterotypes in.
Krunga 7 Jan, 2017 @ 12:01pm 
"Originality" That's why you call me Many Names, hypocrite etc. right? Because you have originality?
surfer171  [author] 7 Jan, 2017 @ 11:59am 
See my point, the bottom feeder that can't come up with originality quotes and result in going around do-si-do in their frilly pants thinking that's he all mighty.

Man up kid, if you're not part of the conversation then you're a lost cause
Krunga 7 Jan, 2017 @ 11:40am 
@SamiSha "Many Names" You're so mature.

Well, Curly knows what he's talking about. While Surfer doesn't and the things I say wont get through his dense head.
SamiSha 7 Jan, 2017 @ 12:47am 
Curly,

Shouldn't be saying "I hate niggers" on @manynames profile? Yeah do that, he probably missed that while you are trying to defend his sorry ass when he told about this B's for help :::::((((
surfer171  [author] 6 Jan, 2017 @ 10:28pm 
Woah woah, settle down. I think you got it wrong as I see you leaning against the second option in my choices given which is telling them off. The lazy town case is the only item on this workshop I filed a DMCA complaint while the rest that were removed are by the user themselves after stating my claims here and there that lately, the community starts to stand up for their rights for a better workshop experience. Maybe you can ask the fnaf kids on what I pretty much did back in 2015 especially the useless hard stains and right now, I'm just running around telling people off about the importance of permission and respect for hard work in conjunction to the 2015 dilemma on a user called Everything_Animation whose work has been leaked followed by the communities of fnaf rampaging for not submitting the accurate models to the workshop that leads to death threats.
Crow Armbrust 6 Jan, 2017 @ 10:04pm 
and you know it
Crow Armbrust 6 Jan, 2017 @ 10:01pm 
The only reason you get away with it is because the steam dmca favors the dmca writer and doesnt let people defend themsleves
Crow Armbrust 6 Jan, 2017 @ 10:00pm 
You cant do that dmca are very serious and perjury can lead to a felony and carries a possible prison sentence of at least one year, plus fines and probation. Just becasse they were unless doesnt mean you can take them down. Everyone wants the steam sfm workshop clean but theres nothing we can do about it
surfer171  [author] 6 Jan, 2017 @ 8:57pm 
On what ground you speak off? The lazy town case that has been technically long closed or the ones being removed for being told off that the said removed items were either useless, pointless or down right being redistributed without permission like songs that the said composer has placed in music selling website like iTunes, soundcloud and the likes of it for example the Living Tombstone for their fnaf sound track
Crow Armbrust 6 Jan, 2017 @ 8:25pm 
your clearly not the legal representative and not the copyright owner so you have clearly commited perjury
surfer171  [author] 6 Jan, 2017 @ 7:48pm 
Via what? I've got a lot, hard to list down due to my persistency of telling them off on the whole usefulness and resourcefulness of said item so yeah… I can say, a lot. What's the interest?
Crow Armbrust 6 Jan, 2017 @ 7:33pm 
can i have a list of te things your have taken down
SamiSha 6 Jan, 2017 @ 12:06am 
Heu pal, Community bans happens when you do a frequently violation and being reported in Small amount of time, if you are community banned, they can't comment at all, now explain to me, how the fuck are you commentijg.

Maybe expired but I'm not sure.
surfer171  [author] 5 Jan, 2017 @ 11:01pm 
It's not ignorant, it's the skepticism in me. You know, better eliminate doubt with reliable sources that one can read and the likes.

Fine, I'll ask people who's in law school then
Crow Armbrust 5 Jan, 2017 @ 10:57pm 
Man your ignorant your wrong ask anyone who's been to law school
surfer171  [author] 5 Jan, 2017 @ 10:53pm 
Ok… but that still doesn't solve the conundrum here, where did that reddit user get the information. Unless I'm missing the whole DMCA complaint etiquette then I'll be looking around for that. For now, the source you've given to me is unreliable, I would rely on the root source in order for me to believe it.
surfer171  [author] 5 Jan, 2017 @ 9:51pm 
Again, I'm still skeptical and I could use a statement said by somebody or a website to where you get the information on your subject. Cause I'm seeing nothing on my self search on permission from copyright holder to file a DMCA complain.
Crow Armbrust 5 Jan, 2017 @ 9:43pm 
you cant you dont own it for example i coukd just dmca this page and theres pretty much nothing you could about and i could say it was for dice but im not going to do that the people could just as easily dmca you steam system is not good for the person getting dmca thats why they get though you cant dmca people unless you have permission or own the content at hand thats the truth you have fun
surfer171  [author] 5 Jan, 2017 @ 9:39pm 
I fail to see any sort of proof or statement from you regarding the requirements of one to have permission from the copyright holder. While you're at it searching for it, I too am looking for one myself on your claims.

For now, I'm skeptical of your claims until there's a statement regarding the need of permission from the copyright holder before sending a DMCA complain
Crow Armbrust 5 Jan, 2017 @ 9:21pm 
im sorry i get you want to help but your cant dmca for them what if they were cool with it and didnt care i would say be careful because you make dmca the wrong person one day and they could fight back
surfer171  [author] 5 Jan, 2017 @ 8:36pm 
how so? It is his fault he dragged himself to the workshop with an obviously copyrighted item so shouldn't the end users take immediate action than waiting for years just for the lazy town company to show up and DMCA themselves.
Crow Armbrust 5 Jan, 2017 @ 8:31pm 
i would recommend contacting them and asking for permission before you dmca someone like this is a big and he could take you to court and most likely win but i don't think nether of you want to spend the time or money it would cost
Crow Armbrust 5 Jan, 2017 @ 8:29pm 
I understand you want to help them and If I had the power I would do it to but you legally cant do that I understand he did infringe on the lazy town music is wrong your heart is the right but your actions are in the wrong