pretty

The ISU-152 is an assault gun, not a tank destroyer. WoT does not have an assault gun category so I used the artillery icon, since they are closer to that than tank destroyers.

bruh have u even played wot because the square means that its an arty and this is an tank destroyer wich is a triangle

UPDATE:

Redid textures.

UPDATE:

Added skybox models.

Object 904 never received the BL-10 gun. It was only intended for a ISU-152 variant that was never built. The object 904 never had any other gun than the ML-20SM.

I can translate title on a right side: For destruction of tigers

When you are Russian and this is good when you understand English xD, object 904 have a BL-10

Exactly!
Success to you in your case.

Warships has PVE though, which is what irks me. That WG's B-Team can pull off a better job.

Yea, PvE and historicity is not about Wargaming.

Yes the model is from WoT, but the point of these ports is to get the vehicles in as much of an historical state as possible. I personally despise the historical inaccuray in WoT, it's the main problem I have with that game along with the lack of pve.

The model stays as it is.

Okay, but the title says that the model is from WoT, and it still has this gun.
it's your business, but if she's fully loaded, you could get more recognition and positive reviews.

No. I will not do unhistorical configurations.

And when I do the ISU-152, the BL-8/10 version will be separate and called ISU-152BM, per it's historical name.

The reason the gun was not accepted was not because it did not pass tests, but because it was deemed unneccessary. The 122mm D-25 cannon was enough to penetrate most German tanks, putting a whole new gun with new ammunition into production would have been a waste of resources.

It's all well and good, but in the game gun BL10 is the place to be, in real life this weapon also existed and held run-is on classic isu152, tests not passed, but to deprive the tank of its main highlights, blasphemy.
PS if you could add it at least as a bodygroup, please.

Ok thanks

Not enough. You will need atleast 8, and optimally 16.

4 GB of ram

How can I fix it if I do not know what's causing the problem?
What directx do you have?
How much ram do you have?
What are your specs?
Have you tried disabling other addons?

Please fix this! when I load the tanks in, it just crash Gmod! please fix this I don't know it's my computer but please fix this!

I had a pretty good laugh demolishing you though. Next time, think before you post, and try to take other people's arguments into consideration. Have a good day.

You know it's pretty funny how you basically forgot about your own argument.
You are the one who came to me and wasted my time, so much for spending time with your friends.

And stop what? Proving your arguments wrong? Maybe since the "proof" you keep handing to me just shows how wrong you are.
Let's see:

You claimed the Obj 704 was not a successor to the ISU-152 (it was)
You claimed it was meant to mount the BL-10 gun (it wasn't)
You claimed the ISU-152BM/-2 mounted the BL-8 gun which not related to the BL-10(it was)
You mistook a British naval howitzer for a Soviet cannon and didn't think something was wrong with it(oh boy were you wrong)
When your argument fell apart you claimed that the BL-10 was not real(it was)
And when you realized how completely wrong you were you tried to pretend I started this argument(I didn't)

And most crucially, you thought you were smarter than me(you aren't)

He mispronounced, there is no gun called MT-20. It's probably due to how Russians pronounce the letter "L".

Now, earlier on you said this:
Now that's where YOU'RE wrong. Look up the ISU-152BM and you'll clearly see it was intended to use a BL-8, which the only results I've turned up for with a quick search was a 203mm naval gun.

If you look at the page I sent you, there is a schematic there. In the bottom, there is a picture of ISU-152 with a 152mm gun. If you need further proof, look at the info box on the lower right corner. The numbers 122mm and 152mm are written there, the first being for the above tank, and the second being for the lower tank.

How does this shut me up? This PROVES MY ORIGINAL POINT.

He says that the 704 gun is a ML-20SM, an modified version of the ML-20 used by the original ISU-152.
Which further shows how the 704 is a successor design of the ISU-152.

FHSW is still more historically accurate than world of tanks so that isn't helping your case.

Also:

As devastating as the BL-8 was, the design did not satisfy the RKKA. Work on a powerful gun continued, and the BL-8 was further improved to become the BL-10 (the BL-9 index was taken by a 122 mm gun). The BL-10 was mounted on the ISU-152-2, also called the ISU-152BM or ISU-152-10. By that time, the war was coming to an end, the Germanic gigantism proved to be containable with the D-25 gun, and work on a high power gun of a large caliber ceased.

Read more here:
http://www.google.pt/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwiIoeGY0PzRAhVLnRoKHTv1AH4QFgg6MAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftankarchives.blogspot.com%2F2013%2F03%2Fbl-8-high-power-152-mm-gun.html&usg=AFQjCNHygk9tqyegGIYrHnsoclbr9TFtuA&sig2=LWy9weqD_8_LFn5bIP1fAg&bvm=bv.146094739,d.d2s

http://i.imgur.com/woWrmfa.jpg

Sure mate, whatever you say.

Furthermore, the BL-8 seems to be just an earlier version of the BL-10. Both of them are 152mm guns.

The 203mm naval gun you found is a BRITISH gun with no relation to the soviet guns.

No. The BL-10 gun was only ever mounted on the ISU-152BM. The 704 with the BL-10 is a fabrication created by World of Tanks. It was NEVER considered.

The 704 was just a 152 rebuild on a IS-3 chassis. The gun it used was an improved version of the ML-20 without muzzle break. It's a successor, whether you like it or not.

I know this is not a normal ISU-152, it was a successor project, an ISU-152 on an IS-3 chassis. I made that very clear in the description. Did you even read it mate?

Thanks, i tried to make it myself, but...
Anyway, gonna make it with ACF. Huge thanks!

Nice

COOL