Cities: Skylines

Cities: Skylines

Circular Exit
13 Comments
cscottromano 1 Jun, 2023 @ 5:16pm 
still working great here in 2023. not the best for super-heavy traffic but amazing for medium or mildly-heavy traffic. looks awesome. Cheers
K666  [author] 14 Aug, 2017 @ 3:30pm 
Thank you very much, landandskygirl! I'm glad you found it useful.
Amayasnep 12 Aug, 2017 @ 6:05pm 
This is my absolute favorite interchange in the entire workshop. Exceptionally efficient with high capacity traffic cities and yet so simple to use, perhaps better than the DCMI. You've made the road geek in me proud. Cheers :steamhappy:
K666  [author] 22 Feb, 2017 @ 7:34am 
So, I tested it for one in-game year in the Better Intersection Stress Test savegame by SlaxX (https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=410405710&searchtext=stress+test) . Basically, I didn't see any significant problems on the roundabout itself although the merging on the highway was expectedly weird. I personally never place interchanges close to each other though. All in all, I'm pretty confident about this one's capacity.
Javious Rex 21 Feb, 2017 @ 11:43am 
To kapustor666, sorry but I don't have a solution for the roundabout issue, there isn't much room to change things around to that extent. The highway paired ramps is easily resolved with the Network Extensions Mod, attaching this intersection with 5 lane highways will give all traffic the lanes they need without merging.
K666  [author] 21 Feb, 2017 @ 9:04am 
Cool! I think I'll do a tougher stress test to some of my intersections, perhaps in the end of the week.
Wettus 21 Feb, 2017 @ 8:00am 
oh i simply meant i havnt had the chance to test so i cant vouch for its efficiency.
K666  [author] 21 Feb, 2017 @ 5:37am 
To Praecipita and jvs: I did test it with a fairly moderate traffic without major problems. Did you experience pileups with it? I do get that there might be some problems with heavier traffic. How do you suggest putting roundabout exit before roundabout enterance? By making one pass over another through a bridge? I think that would require a much bigger junction though. Nevertheless, I'll avoid putting ramps on opposing sides of the highway in the future, I suppose ;)
K666  [author] 21 Feb, 2017 @ 5:29am 
Hi, thank you for your reviews. To Praecipita: Yes, the cone-like things are there so you can connect a large (or small) road to the end of it, thus you'll have a branching road before the roundabout.
Javious Rex 21 Feb, 2017 @ 4:43am 
This is a beautiful service interchange, nice symmetry and the smoothness of the ramps is great. I fear that it's function won't match up to its beauty. On the roundabout the merge points are grouped together and will cause a back up as vehicles try to to enter and exit at nearly the same point. If the exits were placed before the entrances this roundabout design would avoid the merge/weave points and traffic would flow much better. On the highway part having pairs of ramps connect at the same point on the highway look great, but because of how the cims navigate at ramp points the highway effectively becomes a single lane. As a vehicle approaches a highway ramp that they are not using, they merge away from the ramp. With the pairs of ramps together all traffic merges to the center lane creating a big bottleneck.
Wettus 21 Feb, 2017 @ 1:16am 
Yes we are judging by the second picture. Nice exit its pleasing to the eye. i cant vouch for its efficiency though.
Wettus 21 Feb, 2017 @ 1:15am 
How is it meant to work exactly? Are we meant to hook the connecting roads into the bits jutting out from the round about?